.CAT WHOIS Proposed Changes - call for public comments - Think hard!!

[Alex Gakuru]

Thanks I understand your point of view. NCSG's deep concern is with whois
the "one getting useful information" :-)

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 8:38 PM, McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:

> indeed Alex, but I don't see this as being in the interest of
> non-commercials nor in the public interest in the larger sense.
>
> WHOIS is only useful if one can get useful information from it!
>
> Regards,
>
> McTim
>
> On 1/23/12, Alex Gakuru <gakuru at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Isn't NCSG list a vehicle for advancing non-commercial interests?
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 8:26 PM, McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 1/23/12, Konstantinos Komaitis <k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk> wrote:
> >> > So how does my proposal for submitting this set of comments as a NCSG
> >> > position manifests that I 'try to obtain benefits for myself'? I think
> >> there
> >> > is something wrong here with your sense of smelling.
> >>
> >> I didn't mean you personally...You asked if anyone had any objection,
> >> and I raised mine.
> >>
> >> I'm not a big fan of obfuscation of contact details in WHOIS, and
> >> can't see that non-commercials are in any way more or less special per
> >> this requirement than anyone else!
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> McTim
> >> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
> >> route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
> route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20120123/6766c68d/attachment-0001.html>