Fwd: [council] Motion to initiate a PDP on thick Whois

[Wendy Seltzer]

As NCUC recommended in comments that were not opposed by NCSG, I'd
recommend against initiating this PDP.

--Wendy

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	[council] Motion to initiate a PDP on thick Whois
Date: 	Sat, 4 Feb 2012 11:48:58 +0100
From: 	Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder at indom.com>
To: 	council at gnso.icann.org GNSO <council at gnso.icann.org>



Councillors,

Please find attached a motion on thick whois that I wish to make.

Please note that, although I have discussed with the registrars before
making the motion, I am making it in my capacity as Chair of the GNSO
Council in order to make sure work that has been undertaken in this area
continues to move forwards.

The motion simply follows the staff recommendation outlined in the issue
report.

I would ask all of you to take this motion back to your respective
groups and confer with them prior to our next meeting.

This motions suggests the initiation of a new PDP, so it should not be
taken lightly.

Thanks,

Stéphane

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Motion on the Initiation of a PDP on 'thick' Whois - 2 February 2012.doc
Type: application/x-msword
Size: 25088 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20120204/7ca1461b/attachment.bin>