The DNS problem

[Mark Leiser]

Microsoft?

Kind regards,


Mark Leiser


145 Kilmarnock Road
Suite 612
Glasgow G41 3JA
Tel: +44 (0)845 299-7248
Email: markleiser at gmail.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/markleiser
Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/mleiser
Fax: +44 0141-404-2633





On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Kerry Brown <kerry at kdbsystems.com> wrote:

>  I’m not sure who or what you mean by “MS”?****
>
> ** **
>
> Kerry Brown****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* NCSG-Discuss [mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] *On Behalf Of
> *Carl Smith
> *Sent:* August-22-12 12:59 PM
> *To:* NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: [NCSG-Discuss] The DNS problem****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks McTim,
>
> However, DNS is an IP look up system and re-director,  where LISP is a
> programing language.  MS has the major influence in the DNS system.  We
> need a less single source dominated system.  Our hope must come from the
> Open Source mavericks to provide the way.
>
> Lou
>
> On 8/21/2012 11:29 AM, McTim wrote:****
>
> ** **
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Carl Smith <lectriclou at hotmail.com>
> wrote:****
>
> The DNS problem and reason for confusion is due to limitations imposed
> during the infancy of development stages of machine inter-connectivity.
> Basically, IP is insufficient to grant each machine a unique identity. The
> limited IP addresses are licensed to master networks which in turn are
> sub-netted to machines which only have a local identity slaved to the
> master.****
>
> Ultimately, we need a unique ID for each machine which is not slaved or
> controlled by a master.****
>
>
>
> Is this a DNS issue or an ID/Locator problem?
>
>
> If so, LISP may be what you want to look at here, not the DNS.
> ****
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
> indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel****
>
> ** **
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20120822/9702e174/attachment-0001.html>