Saudi Arabia objects to some new gTLDs

[Mark Leiser]

To me, this only reaffirms Professor Mueller's statement about objecting to
sensitivities. If every country objected (and won the argument) based on a
sensitivity issue...



Kind regards,


Mark Leiser


145 Kilmarnock Road
Suite 612
Glasgow G41 3JA
Tel: +44 (0)845 299-7248
Email: markleiser at gmail.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#!/markleiser
Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/mleiser
Fax: +44 0141-404-2633





On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Marc Perkel <marc at churchofreality.org>wrote:

> What if Richard Branson of Virgin Airlines wanted .virgin? That would
> actually make sense.
>
> http://www.virgin.com/company
>
>
> On 8/14/2012 9:38 PM, Horacio T. Cadiz wrote:
>
>>   We've been discussing new gTLDs and HR. Milton objected to the
>> statement:  "Consideration of applications for new TLDs should be
>> mindful of sensitivities."
>>
>>   KSA objects to .virgin, .baby, and others
>>
>> http://www.electronista.com/**articles/12/0/14/icann.**
>> receives.registration.**complaints.on.moral.health.**grounds/<http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/0/14/icann.receives.registration.complaints.on.moral.health.grounds/>
>>
>>
>>    The sensitivities of the KSA have been aroused.
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20120815/72281a4a/attachment-0001.html>