European Commission responds to NCUC's letter on whois privacy concerns - Fwd: Ares(2012)966299 - Online privacy in ICANN

[Carl Smith]

On 8/10/2012 2:17 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
> sounds like we should make sure Reding gets a copy.
>
> avri
>
> On 10 Aug 2012, at 16:51, Robin Gross wrote:
>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: EC ARES NOREPLY <DIGIT-NOREPLYARES at ec.europa.eu>
>>> Date: August 10, 2012 8:42:30 AM PDT
>>> To: "CAKE David (IP JUSTICE)" <dave at difference.com.au>
>>> To: "GROSS Robin (IP JUSTICE)" <Robin at ipjustice.org>
>>> Subject: Ares(2012)966299 - Online privacy in ICANN
>>>
>>> Please find attached document Ares(2012)966299 concerning "Online privacy in ICANN" sent by Mr HARTOG Eddy on 10/08/2012.
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Note: This e-mail was automatically generated by the European Commission's central mail registration system.
>>> Replies by e-mail must be addressed to the original sender HARTOG Eddy (mailto:Eddy.Hartog at ec.europa.eu).
>>> Remarque : Cet e-mail a été généré automatiquement par le système d'enregistrement central du courrier de la Commission européenne.
>>> Toute réponse éventuelle par e-mail doit être adressée à l'expéditeur en personne, à savoir HARTOG Eddy (mailto:Eddy.Hartog at ec.europa.eu).
>> <reply-to-NCUC-20120807-ag2Ares[1] AB.pdf>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> IP JUSTICE
>> Robin Gross, Executive Director
>> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
>> p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
>> w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin at ipjustice.org
>>
>>
>>
>

Your posting to the NCSG-DISCUSS list has been rejected by the content filter.
Please resubmit with a non-blank subject.


ForwardedMessage.eml

From:
Carl Smith <lectriclou at hotmail.com>
Date:
8/10/2012 4:25 PM

To:
NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU


Consensus rule is most like the game of one shell in a revolver. Not 
that participants are intentionally contrary to reality, but rather; 
misinformed, narrow minded, or hold a personal stake. The path well 
trodden often leads to a dead end at some point. Diversity, though it 
seems to mean confusion, is much more likely to find a better and more 
sustainable solution to a current question. In the end, perfection may 
not be reached, however it may be more closely approached. I am more 
inclined to diversity in rule of order. The rule being flexible enough 
to allow for a different path and yet rigidly opposed to authoritarian 
mandate. Historically, loosening the bonds on entrepreneurs to build 
commerce has greatly improved standards of living around the world. When 
entrepreneurs are suppressed by what ever means for the preservation of 
a de facto elite, standards of life and health decline.


Just my opinion.


Lou Smith



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20120810/4be3d7b7/attachment-0001.html>