draft agenda for NCUC constituency day in Dakar!!
Hakikur Rahman
email at HAKIK.ORG
Sat Oct 22 16:26:14 CEST 2011
I support.
At 14:50 22-10-2011, Alex Gakuru wrote:
>I support.
>
>On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Konstantinos
>Komaitis <<mailto:k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk>k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk> wrote:
>Yeap JAS will be briefly discussed at the NCUC
>constituency day and I would like to encourage
>NCUC members to endorse this statement. I would
>also like to encourage this statement to be
>submitted as an NCSG position it is a very
>important issue and many hours have been logged
>on by both Rafik and Avri in order to make sure
>that support is provided to applicants from developing countries.
>
>Thanks
>
>KK
>
>From: Rafik Dammak
><<mailto:rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM>rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM<mailto:rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM>>
>Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 14:04:56 +0100
>To: Konstantinos Komaitis
><<mailto:k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk>k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk<mailto:k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk>>
>Cc:
>"<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>"
><<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>>
>Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] draft agenda for NCUC constituency day in Dakar!!
>
>Hi Konstantinos,
>
>I would like to ask an item for the agenda
>regarding JAS, it will be topic for the public
>forum (and board is expected to make decision
>about the JAS final report). ALAC is planning to
>make statement too. thanks to Avri for works done on the proposed statement.
>
>Rafik
>
>*******************************************************************
>
>The NCUC wishes to congratulate the JAS WG on
>the recommendations it has made to enable the
>new gTLD program to become one that gives a fair
>chance to the developing world. As the NCUC, we
>have been arguing for policies in support of
>fairness since the time when the new gTLD policy
>was first being discussed in the GNSO and have
>continued this by active participation in the
>JAS WG, including having members serve as the
>JAS WG co-chair. We are heartened to see that
>this effort is now being championed by the GAC
>and the ALAC and want to once again lend our voice to the call for fairness.
>
>We encourage the Board to approve all of the
>measures in the JAS report, and wish to single
>out a few that we believe need immediate
>approval and implementation. Without question,
>the fee reduction as recommend in the JAS
>report, where all qualified development economy
>applicants pay a reduced fee of $47, 000 USD, is
>necessary if the new gTLD program is to be
>considered fair. Even charging development
>economy applicants $47,000 USD will be a
>challenge, but we understand the need for
>applicants to have some degree of financial
>stake in the application. To require more would
>exclude these applicants from any chance of
>making an application in this round. We accept
>the arguments as given in the JAS
>recommendations that making these fee reduction
>is consistent with the policy recommendation of
>the GNSO and accept the proposals offered in
>that document of ways in which the reserve fund
>portion of the collected fees and the
>expectation of auction funds can be used to
>satisfy the requirements for a self funding new gTLD application process
>
>We also support the suggestion in the report, as
>well as suggestions made by others that the
>continuity instrument required by applicants
>need to be made more affordable for the
>development economy applicant. The requirements
>in the current Application Guidebook, will be
>incredibly difficult for regular applicants
>would be a complete barrier to any applicant
>from a developing economy. This needs immediate redress.
>
>Finally we urge the Board to accept the proposal
>in the JAS recommendation for a Board organized
>working group to create an ICANN Foundation that
>would as its first goal be able to raise and
>distribute funds to assist developing economies
>in meeting the other expenses of creating
>registries to serve the populations of the
>world's developing economies. We appreciate the
>seed funds offered by the ICANN Board and
>encourage those who have financially benefited
>so greatly from domain name industry and from
>their involvement with ICANN to contribute
>generously to build on this seed once the
>Foundation is created. In the meantime we
>encourage all those who can, to publicly pledge
>to such a fund in anticipation of its creation.
>
>
>
>
>
>2011/10/20 Konstantinos Komaitis
><<mailto:k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk>k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk<mailto:k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk>>
>Dear all,
>
>In preparation for the constituency day
>(Tuesday, October 25, 2011)in Dakar, find below
>a draft agenda. Please suggest topics and/or
>issues that you would like us to discuss during the NCUC meeting.
>
>Thank you
>
>KK
>
>Proposed Agenda for NCUC
>
>
>1. Membership issues
>
>2. Policy issues (WHOIS, UDRP, Outreach
>Task Force WG, domain name takedowns etc.)
>
>3. Forthcoming NCUC elections (Chair and NCUC EC)
>
>4. Constituency relations
>
>5. Updates from NCUC Councillors
>
>6. Policy strategy and goals.
>
>PS: I will be posting the dial in details in the
>website within the next few days.
>
>Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
>
>Senior Lecturer,
>Director of Postgraduate Instructional Courses
>Director of LLM Information Technology and Telecommunications Law
>University of Strathclyde,
>The Law School,
>Graham Hills building,
>50 George Street, Glasgow G1 1BA
>UK
>tel: <tel:%2B44%20%280%29141%20548%204306>+44
>(0)141 548 4306<tel:%2B44%20%280%29141%20548%204306>
><http://www.routledgemedia.com/books/The-Current-State-of-Domain-Name-Regulation-isbn9780415477765>http://www.routledgemedia.com/books/The-Current-State-of-Domain-Name-Regulation-isbn9780415477765
>Selected publications:
><http://hq.ssrn.com/submissions/MyPapers.cfm?partid=501038>http://hq.ssrn.com/submissions/MyPapers.cfm?partid=501038
>Website: <http://www.komaitis.org>www.komaitis.org<http://www.komaitis.org>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20111022/fce2caa8/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list