KASWESHA APPLICATION
McTim
dogwallah at GMAIL.COM
Thu Nov 17 12:54:50 CET 2011
On 11/17/11, William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch> wrote:
> How to reconcile these two statements is a conundrum….
Indeed.
On the specifics of this application, while I am sure that KASWESHA is
a non-commercial organisation, the fact that they have a .co.ke might
be disqualifying. I think this is unfair.
The domain kbo.co.ke is a multistakeholder PPP with the GoKenya,
Google, KENIC and others coming together to make it easy to get "kenya
Buisnesses Online", hence kbo.co.ke.
It's a free service, so fairly popular.
How does the NCSG-EC reconcile inclusion with rigid rules?
--
Cheers,
McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list