[ncsg-policy] RE: Draft of statement for workshop on new gTLDs

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I think calling it an NCSG position depends on whether the NCSG Policy Committee can reach near consensus on the items in this list as currently drawn up (or after consensus based editing)

I am however, ready to include a statement about the NPOC position, especially as regards issue 6.

thanks

a.



On 14 Mar 2011, at 10:20, <HughesDeb at usa.redcross.org> wrote:

> Avri, Konstantinos, Robin and Mary,
> 
> Thank you so much for working on this draft under such a tight deadline.
> 
> 
> I have not had the opportunity to discuss with my NPOC colleagues, but
> after my review this morning, I think it would be best if this was
> submitted as a NCUC statement, or perhaps a joint statement between NCUC
> and the proposed Consumer Const, if they approve.  I think it is
> important for this viewpoint to be shared, even if I and my NPOC
> colleagues do not support the conclusions and content.  I would ask that
> you clearly state the statement does not represent those of the members
> of the Proposed Not-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency.
> 
> From the perspective of a non-profit organization that needs effective
> and efficient and reasonable means to execute and protect its
> philanthropic, capacity-building and humanitarian activities online
> (underscored by nefarious activity occurring now related to the disaster
> in Japan and the pacific area) I have serious concerns supporting the
> positions taken related to Section 6, among other areas - although I
> acknowledge the difference in perspectives.  
> 
> Thanks,
> Debbie
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri at ltu.se] 
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 11:58 AM
> To: ncsg-policy at n4c.eu Committee
> Cc: NCSG Members List
> Subject: [ncsg-policy] Draft of statement for workshop on new gTLDs
> 
> Hi,
> 
> With some help and some editing, I have the draft of the statement I
> intend to use, should a statement be what is mandated.
> 
> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Board-GAC+Workshop+S
> corecard+March+2011
> 
> I have not finished the table at the bottom  yet, but will be working on
> that during the meeting.
> 
> Please discuss the wording, and in so far as we have consensus or rough
> consensus on wording changes, I will make changes.  The views in this
> have been generated from previous positions NCSG has taken in statements
> and elsewhere.  The original ratings were done with the help of
> Konstantinos and Robin.  They have been reviewed by Mary.
> 
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> ----
> Everything about this list: http://info.n4c.eu/sympa/info/ncsg-policy