IGF and us

[warigia bowman]

Right, I am coming to Nairobi for the IGF as well.

I will be the social coordinator and show you all the hot bars!

Rigia

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Balleste, Roy <rballeste at stu.edu> wrote:

> I will be arriving on the 24th.  Count me in.
>
> Roy Balleste
> Law Library Director
> Associate Professor of Law
> St. Thomas University
> 16401 NW 37th Avenue
> Miami Gardens, FL 33054  USA
> 1-305-623-2341
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Alex Gakuru
> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 7:34 AM
> To: NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> Subject: Re: IGF and us
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> I would be delighted to organise an outreach event! NCUCers coming
> over just holla.
>
> Karibu Kenya!
>
> Alex
>
> On 7/14/11, William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > There could be some interesting synergy possibilities between the IGF
> and
> > the ICANNsphere this time, e.g. with the new gTLD & JAS issues taken
> up in
> > the main sessions, the Katim-instigated initiatve on ICANN &
> developing
> > countries percolating pre-Dakar, etc.  Maybe something could be done
> along
> > the lines of the outreach event Alex organized for the Nairobi ICANN,
> albeit
> > on a smaller scale, and/or drawing on the SF workshop format...?
> >
> > I'll be there from Friday 23 Sept. Meetings (GigaNet, APC, ISOC, the
> > ministerial) start Monday 26th, IGF from the 27th.  If anyone else
> will be
> > around Sat-Sun 24-25 and interested in making something happen, I'd be
> happy
> > to join the effort.
> >
> > Best
> >
> > Bill
> >
> > On Jul 4, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
> >
> >> Carissimi,
> >>
> >> The IGF is approaching. Whatever our views on it, some of us will be
> >> there in some capacity (mostly in the workshops, I guess). Could we
> >> think of something among us as NCUC/NCSG taking advantage of being
> there
> >> -- maybe some face-to-face agenda regarding the ICANN process
> pre-Senegal?
> >>
> >> First of, we would need to know who will be there.
> >>
> >> []s fraternos
> >>
> >> --c.a.
> >>
> >> On 07/03/2011 07:57 PM, Nicolas Adam wrote:
> >>> Thank you both.
> >>>
> >>> I agree that we should keep our propositions for the Review, but i
> was
> >>> glad to be able to read some of them in advance.
> >>>
> >>> Nicolas
> >>>
> >>> On 7/3/2011 10:40 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> >>>> KK:
> >>>> Thanks for making the comments better. However, on the issue of
> >>>> proposing specific substantive and procedural changes, I think it
> >>>> would be a tactical mistake to do so in this round of comments. I
> >>>> think the main issue now is whether the review takes place at all.
> We
> >>>> should not, in my opinion, let other groups know what we would
> >>>> consider acceptable changes until we are actually in a review.
> >>>>
> >>>> You will recall that in Singapore we agreed to work on a reference
> >>>> document regarding what changes would be ideal from our point of
> view.
> >>>> I still believe that work should proceed on that document, but it
> >>>> should not be confused with the comments on the need for a review,
> imho.
> >>>>
> >>>> --MM
> >>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: Konstantinos Komaitis [mailto:k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk]
> >>>>> Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 6:48 AM
> >>>>> To: Milton L Mueller; NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> >>>>> Subject: Re: proposed comments on UDRP
> >>>>> Importance: High
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am sending a draft with my additions on the substantive and
> >>>>> procedural
> >>>>> changes we would like to see in the UDRP. Apologies if I went a
> bit
> >>>>> overboard here, but as you may many of these issues are covered in
> my
> >>>>> book - so I tried to include them without being academically
> pedantic.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> May I suggest we use this document as our master copy and I have
> also
> >>>>> uploaded it in a piratepad version
> (http://piratepad.net/sNv8ukSm1V)
> >>>>> for
> >>>>> those who do use open source software.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The deadline for submission is July 15 and I can submit them. May
> I,
> >>>>> therefore, have all your suggestions/recommendations no later than
> July
> >>>>> 14, 2011.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>>
> >>>>> KK
> >>>>>
> >>>>> From: Milton L Mueller<mueller at SYR.EDU<mailto:mueller at SYR.EDU>>
> >>>>> Reply-To: Milton L
> Mueller<mueller at SYR.EDU<mailto:mueller at SYR.EDU>>
> >>>>> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:30:01 +0100
> >>>>> To: "NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:NCSG-NCUC-
> >>>>> DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>"<NCSG-NCUC-
> >>>>>
> DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU<mailto:NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>>
> >>>>> Subject: proposed comments on UDRP
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please consider the attached document my contribution to the
> effort. It
> >>>>> gets us started. I do not have time to do much more, so I hope
> others
> >>>>> can finish it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Milton L. Mueller
> >>>>> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
> Internet
> >>>>> Governance Project http://blog.internetgovernance.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile device
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20110714/79fd3b38/attachment-0001.html>