Open letter to ICANN from the Legal Counsels of intergovernmental organizations
dogwallah at GMAIL.COM
Mon Dec 19 14:01:30 CET 2011
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> On 19 Dec 2011, at 03:10, David Cake wrote:
> > The GNSO should absolutely not throw this issue in with RC and IOC
> issues IMO, and should come out fairly strongly against this idea that the
> Reserved Name should be expanded on a general public interest idea.
> Why not? Aren't they all similar/equivalent as either good or bad ideas?
yes, all equivalently bad ideas IMHO.
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ncuc-discuss