Open letter to ICANN from the Legal Counsels of intergovernmental organizations

[McTim]

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

> On 19 Dec 2011, at 03:10, David Cake wrote:
>
> >       The GNSO should absolutely not throw this issue in with RC and IOC
> issues IMO, and should come out fairly strongly against this idea that the
> Reserved Name should be expanded on a general public interest idea.
>
>
> Why not? Aren't they all similar/equivalent as either good or bad ideas?
>

yes, all equivalently bad ideas IMHO.


--
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20111219/2a5a5b27/attachment-0001.html>