SPAM-LOW: Constituencies, old and new

[Alex Gakuru]

Spot on Milton! See:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/soac-newgtldapsup-wg/msg00627.html
It was just after the Board had decided to do away with the work we'd done
on JAS-WG. However, they later on changed their mind and "encouraged us to
carry on with the work."


On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

>  Off list
>
>
>
> *From:* NCSG-NCUC [mailto:NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] *On Behalf
> Of *Rosemary Sinclair
>
>
>
> Hmmm - the way I read our proposed Charter is that a Constituency however
> formed (whether from within or by direct application to the Board)
>
> When it is within NCSG (whether formed from within or attached by the
> Board)
>
> Is then bound by our Charter rules on voting, Councillors etc
>
> That would be incorrect.
>
> If NPOC is formed under our proposed NCSG charter, then it is bound by our
> rules on voting, Councillors, etc.
>
> But our charter is not in effect yet, and clearly Amber and Debbie are not
> applying under those rules.
>
>
>
> So if the constituency is approved before the NCSG charter is approved, we
> really have no idea how NCSG works.
>
> And it is possible, though not likely, that we revert to the old
> constituency rules, which creates the walled garden/silos.
>
> No way around it: Debbie and Amber’s move was untimely and not
> constructive. Even if you like their constituency proposal, the way they’ve
> done it creates a mess.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20101111/87de6061/attachment-0001.html>