NPOC charter update

[Amber Sterling]

Looking forward to hearing from Rosemary.

Amber Sterling
Senior Intellectual Property Specialist
Association of American Medical Colleges


-----Original Message-----
From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of
Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 8:56 AM
To: NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Subject: Re: NPOC charter update

Dear Amber,

Thanks. I ask Rosemary, the NCSG-EC vice chair, who has taken the lead
on membership issue to get back to you.  I remember that in at least one
case there as question about the make up of the membership of the
organization. And that while the group applying was not-for-profit, it
was a aggregation of associations some of which appeared to have a
for-profit orientation.  We had left it as a case for more
investigation, and stalled at that point.  And for that I reiterate my
regrets - as my only defense, I have tended to get bogged down in the
charter issues.

I do not remember the details off-hand, so hopefully Rosemary can get
back to you with the details and can follow through.

Best Regards,

a.


On 2 Nov 2010, at 10:39, Amber Sterling wrote:

> Hi Avri,
> 
> Please send any questions you or the EC may have regarding the
> perspective members to me as each organization meets (my understanding
> of) the NCSG membership requirements.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Amber
> 
> Amber Sterling
> Senior Intellectual Property Specialist
> Association of American Medical Colleges
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf
Of
> Avri Doria
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 7:59 AM
> To: NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> Subject: Re: NPOC charter update
> 
> On 1 Nov 2010, at 19:43, Amber Sterling wrote:
> 
>> Additionally, Debbie
>> and I brought 6 new perspective members to the NCSG in May 2010;
their
>> applications are still pending. 
> 
> 
> For this I must apologize.   The NCSG-EC did put in a process for
> handling it, but on several of these we got down and never reached the
> unanimous approval required and got bogged down waiting for the next
> step.
> 
> I  have copied the NCSG-EC list on this one in the hope that we do get
> this back on the track.  Your applications was easy since no one had
any
> issues, but on the others, there were questions that needed to be
> followed up that I don't think ever were.
> 
> I can't offer any explanation other than the focus has been so much on
> the getting the charter through, little else has happened in the EC.
> 
> a.
> 
>From From:         =?iso-8859-1?Q?"Kleinwächter,_Wolfgang"?= Wed Nov  3 20:53:39 EET 2010
To: NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Date:         Wed, 3 Nov 2010 19:53:39 +0100
Reply-To:     =?iso-8859-1?Q?"Kleinwächter,_Wolfgang"?              <wolfgang.kleinwaechter at MEDIENKOMM.UNI-HALLE.DE>
Sender:       NCSG-NCUC <NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
From:         =?iso-8859-1?Q?"Kleinwächter,_Wolfgang"?              <wolfgang.kleinwaechter at MEDIENKOMM.UNI-HALLE.DE>
Subject:      AW: Petition to form a new ICANN constituency
X-To:         Amber Sterling <asterling at AAMC.ORG>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Message-ID:  <2DA93620FC07494C926D60C8E3C2F1A8A073AA at server1.medienkomm.uni-halle.de>

Amber

I would be also thankful if you could reply to my questions.

Would it be possible to provide a list of such waiting organisations? And would it be also possible to specifiy your outreach  activities in currently under-represented regions. I am in particular interested what you have done in Eastern Europa, Central Asia and Eastern and Western Africa.

wolfgang

________________________________

Von: Amber Sterling [mailto:asterling at AAMC.ORG]
Gesendet: Mi 03.11.2010 14:48
An: NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Betreff: Re: Petition to form a new ICANN constituency



Hi All,

I am compiling a list of questions posed regarding the NPOC charter and
will respond later today... the issue about whether or not the NPOC
would include "various national Chamber of Commerce or the International
Chamber of Commerce" is a non-starter.  The proposed NPOC would be a
constituency within the NCSG and therefore must meet NCSG membership
requirements.

Kind regards,
Amber

-----Original Message-----
From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of
Carlos A. Afonso
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 9:18 AM
To: NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Subject: Re: Petition to form a new ICANN constituency

The way it is phrased now, yes, sure.

--c.a.

On 11/03/2010 10:58 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> On 3 Nov 2010, at 08:43, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
>
>> The mission statement is phrased to involve *any* non-profit,
including business associations (non-profits which defend commercial
interests),
>
>
> Would this include the various national Chamber of Commerce or the
International Chamber of Commerce?
>
> Though the ICC is currently part of the BC, should we look forward to
them joining the NPOC?
>
> Thanks
>
> a.