Proposed disposition - Re: Sinclair comments - Members review of Draft Proposed NCSG Charter

[Rosemary Sinclair]

Looks workable to me

Rosemary
Sent from my BlackBerry® from Optus

-----Original Message-----
From: "Milton L Mueller" <mueller at SYR.EDU>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 23:30:14 
To: <NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
Subject: Re: Proposed disposition - Re: Sinclair comments - Members review of Draft Proposed NCSG Charter

> -----Original Message-----
 > What I wanted to ensure was that my right to individual membership is
 > not over-ridden by my status as employee/member of an organisation.
 > This could be fixed by separating out three types of membership:
 
 OK, I get it. I support this.
 
 > Class 2 can be limited by decision of the EC to a maximum number of
 > individuals representing any particular organisation and denied for
 > anyone whose organisation is in Class 1. However, individual membership under
 > class 3 is still allowed, even where an individual happens to be an
 > employee/member of an NCSG member organisation.
 
 Does this language work for you? Our concern is that a large organization might try to "take over" by ordering its employees or members to join as individuals. This "threat" has always been purely hypothetical and some have been more worried about it than others. So we've put in a check by the EC in case something fishy seems to be up.
 
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20100505/bc31d8b5/attachment.html>