Sinclair comments - Members review of Draft Proposed NCSG Charter

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Rosemary,

about resourcing Interest Groups, I think that there is no need
for commitment from the Board as the toolkit document drafted by the OSC CSG
WT and which was approved by the GNSO council intent to provide needed
resources for Groups. The ICANN staff is working now on the implementation (
I asked about that few weeks ago).

Regards

Rafik

2010/5/3 Rosemary Sinclair <rosemary.sinclair at atug.org.au>

> Hi Avri
>
> I am happy to go with consensus - my only purpose was to provide you with
> some input based on my views
>
> The highlighting was just to point to the specific words that caused me to
> comment
>
> My point on Constituencies is an administrative one - and if Board is happy
> for NCSG to have only Interest Groups then I suggest we ask the Board to
> commit to resourcing Interest Groups eg the discussion on face to face mtgs
> of some months ago
>
> I'm happy to provide more info on any point that might be unclear
>
> Cheers
>
> Rosemary
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry® from Optus
> ------------------------------
> *From: * "Avri Doria" <avri at LTU.SE>
> *Date: *Mon, 3 May 2010 13:45:52 +1000
> *To: *<NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>
> *Subject: *Re: Sinclair comments - Members review of Draft Proposed NCSG
> Charter
>
> Hi,
>
> I have read through your extensive edits and on first reading, I have a
> question and a comment:
>
>
> - the question:  I do not understand why you have highlighted section in
> yellow.  do you mean that the charter should have these things highlighted.
>
> - On the question of constituencies.
>
> The board has already approved two Stakeholder Groups charters that do not
> have constituencies.    As I understood our conversations with the SIC and
> the Board they are not requiring constituencies so long as we have a clear
> charter and we explain the decisions we have made.    This is the purpose of
> the cover letter which is still being worked.
>
> Yours is the first call I have seen from within the NCSG for us to continue
> with formal constituencies and I do not know if there is any other support
> for it with the NCSG membership.
>
> At this point unless I see strong support from the members, I do not think
> it is something we should change.
>
> I will look through the rest of your proposed edits in detail.
>
> a.
>
> On 2 May 2010, at 22:31, Rosemary Sinclair wrote:
>
> > Hi Avri and everyone
> >
> > Some thoughts for discussion
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Rosemary
> >
> > Rosemary Sinclair
> > Managing Director, ATUG
> > Chairman, INTUG
> > T: +61 2 94958901  F: +61 2 94193889
> > M: +61 413734490
> > Email: rosemary.sinclair at atug.org.au
> > Skype: rasinclair
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20100505/108e6c14/attachment.html>