please send comments on this draft RE: Transparency

Robin Gross robin at IPJUSTICE.ORG
Thu Mar 11 09:35:02 CET 2010


Below is first draft joint NCSG-ALAC statement on the need for
transparency of the Secret Board Briefings.

The stmt isn't something that we would release or publish this week.
However, Avri and I may meet with  ALAC this afternoon to discuss
this draft.  So please send any comments on this draft so we can
bring those into this mtg today in a few hours.  We will have a
revised draft after the mtg.  Thank you.

Robin

-------
For many meetings now,  the topic of Staff Briefing to the Board and
Transparency has been on the table.

While understanding that there indeed some briefings that should
remain confidential between the Board and the Staff especially those
within its fiduciary capacities and those encumbered by personal
privacy consideration, there are also many issues that require
transparency.

Within the categories that require transparency there are two
separate types of issue.

The first type are briefings that concern an Advisory Committee or a
Supporting Organization.  In the case of this type of briefing, it is
not appropriate for the Staff to be making unverified claims about
and AC or SO without the knowledge of that AC and SO.  Without AC or
SO verification of the contents of a briefing, the Board is left
making its evaluation based on rumor and may make decisions based on
erroneous information.

The second type of briefing are those that concern the policy work
for which the SOs are responsible and on which the ACs must advise.
For the Board to be making policy decision based on information that
has not been reviewed by the community constitutes gaming of the
bottom up policy process and gives one member of the community, the
paid staff and undue advantage over the other participants in the
community.

We request that the Board change its policy so that the briefing of
the types discussed above be made available to the correct audience;
the first type being made available to the SO or AC in question and
the second type be made available to the community.

After the policy has been received we request that recent briefings
that have contributed to various decisions also be released.



IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin at ipjustice.org



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20100311/7b009b3c/attachment.html>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list