How about a "." (nothing) TLD?
Marc Perkel
marc at CHURCHOFREALITY.ORG
Thu Mar 18 16:27:14 CET 2010
Alex Gakuru wrote:
> One finds a number of developing countries' registries equally guilty
> of hesitation in disclosing such their "business" (thus
> 'confidential') information and data. Never mind their much publicised
> 'public interest' purpose of existence. Some even (mis)use this status
> quo as a basis of charging consumers unreasonably high domain
> registrations fees.
>
> To solve this problem, the Consumer Interest Group has been exploring
> a new type of business model (for now just call it "consumer-owned
> registries") where motive for profit is essentially zero! Fees will be
> the closest to actual costs and any surplus income over expenditure
> -all of it! (i.e. no accumulated bank reserves) shall be used to
> promote public interest internet growth in developing regions.
>
> It means that we shall explore ways of impressing upon ICANN to waive
> the 185K, among others. If interested, then please join our mailing
> list where we'll have the conversation started soon.
>
> regards,
>
> Alex
>
>
Yes Alex - there seems to be two models here. One is the traditional
model offering public registration and all the complexities associated
with that. In that model the $185k is justified because the hard part is
the registrar part.
However - another model is where you are just using the TLD for private
name resolution and you and not offering public registration but rather
allowing an organization to use it like a second level domain name. For
example, .ibm, .microsoft, .google, .catholic, etc. That way - for
example, instead of going to google.com you can just go to google. In
this situation the .google TLD would be owned by google and they would
control it just like they control google.com.
In the second model the TLD is no more complex than running ant other
standard name server. It would be equivelene to running a "." (nothing)
TLD where instead of registering .com, .net .org or .info you would just
register with "."
You would need a registrar to handle the "." TLD.
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list