[ncsg-policy] NCSG mtg with the ICANN Board.

[Carlos A. Afonso]

This seems reasonable tactics.

enviado via iPhone

On 06/03/2010, at 15:33, Milton L Mueller <mueller at SYR.EDU> wrote:

> I agree with Mary that you shouldn’t tag the agenda to something as  
> narrow as SIGs. The NCSG charter progress is the key issue, and the  
> Consumer constituency and IGs within NCSG can be covered within that 
>  framework.
>
>
>
> From: Non-Commercial User Constituency [mailto:NCUC- 
> DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of Mary Wong
> Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 7:30 AM
> To: NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] [ncsg-policy] NCSG mtg with the ICANN  
> Board.
>
>
> While I agree that the consumer interest group (and broader  
> relationship with the proposed consumers constituency) issue is  
> important to us and should be discussed, I think the discussion  
> should take place within the broader context of "where, when and how  
> the Board sees the progress towards a final charter going".
>
> In addition, we could (if time permits) engage the Board in other  
> issues of some importance to our group and the non-commercial  
> community, e.g. ensuring adequate representation on each of the AoC  
> Review Teams and the difficulties/need for support (financial and  
> staff) for even more outreach activities.
>
> Cheers
> Mary
>
> Mary W S Wong
> Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> Franklin Pierce Law Center
> Two White Street
> Concord, NH 03301
> USA
> Email: mwong at piercelaw.edu
> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network  
> (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>
>
> >>>
> From:
> Alex Gakuru <gakuru at GMAIL.COM>
> To:
> <NCUC-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
> Date:
> 3/6/2010 7:16 AM
> Subject:
> Re: [ncsg-policy] NCSG mtg with the ICANN Board.
> I agree - just the consumer agenda from me.
>
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:09 PM, William Drake
> <william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch> wrote:
> > why not try to really draw them out on whether our interest group  
> approach is really definitely ok and we can proceed, and if so the  
> relevance to consumer etc
> >
> > On Mar 6, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The Board has confirmed that they will meet with the NCSG during  
> our Tuesday meeting from 11:15 - 12:15.
> >>
> >> They have asked whether we have any specific agenda items we can  
> send them beforehand.
> >>
> >> Suggestions?
> >>
> >> thanks
> >>
> >> a.
> >>
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20100306/080e0190/attachment.html>