voting results: Charter Approved
Wendy Seltzer
wendy at SELTZER.COM
Sun Jun 13 19:31:29 CEST 2010
Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
> Yes -- the 215 votes in favor represent more than 68% of the total
> possible votes (recalling that each voter could have one, two or four
> votes). The complete voters list had a possible total of 315 votes.
>
Thanks Carlos!
Great participation and great news for NCSG that we've been able to
achieve this milestone. I hope these will help us to convince the Bpard
that it's time to let NCSG move forward as a community.
Thanks to everyone who helped to educate voters and get out the vote,
and thanks especially to Avri and Robin for their work spearheading the
process.
--Wendy
--
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org
Fellow, Silicon Flatirons Center at University of Colorado Law School
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
http://wendy.seltzer.org
http://www.chillingeffects.org/
https://www.torproject.org/
>> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Carlos A. Afonso<ca at cafonso.ca> wrote:
>>> Dear people, I am happy to inform the results of the voting process
>>> regarding our Charter:
>>>
>>> NCUC Elections
>>>
>>> NCUC
>>>
>>> Results
>>>
>>> Do you approve the revision of the NCSG Charter?
>>>
>>> Yes - 215
>>> No - 10
>>>
>>> This has been automatically posted by the registro.br voting system
>>> at the
>>> end of the voting period. Source:
>>> http://registro.br/ncuc/result
>>>
>>> This is a 95.6% approval! Congratulations to you all.
>>>
>>> fraternal regards
>>>
>>> --c.a.
>>>
>>
>
>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list