Vote, Cover Letter and Charter

[Avri Doria]

hi,

i can add something on the weighted voting.

and i will search for the typos.

thanks for your edits.

a.

On 14 Jun 2010, at 22:33, Mary Wong wrote:

> Thanks for taking the lead and all the drafting on this (and so many other things), Avri - and thank you for taking my comments on board too :)
>  
> There are a couple of typos (some of which may have been my fault during my energetic red-lining earlier), but I also had a question - we say that we couldn't reach 2 members and so asked Olga to step in as a trusted third party intermediary, but then she receives 6 votes - is there something we need to add to explain those numbers?
>  
> Thanks,
> Mary
>  
> Mary W S Wong
> Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
> Franklin Pierce Law Center
> Two White Street
> Concord, NH 03301
> USA
> Email: mwong at piercelaw.edu
> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
> Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
> 
> 
> >>>
> From:	Avri Doria <avri at LTU.SE>
> To:	<NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
> Date:	6/14/2010 10:13 PM
> Subject:	Vote, Cover Letter and Charter
> Hi,
> 
> As as been announced the Charter was accepted.
> 
> Details on the vote can be found at: https://st.icann.org/ncsg-ec/index.cgi?non_commercial_stakeholder_group
> 
> Of 199 possible voters, 142 members voted that 71.3%.
> Of 314 possible votes, 231 votes were cast that is 73.6%
> 
> of which 221 votes were in favor of the charter
> and 10 were against the charter.
> 
> These means that 70.38% of the members vote were in favor of the charter, which is greater then the 60% threshold defined for success.
> 
> My thanks to ALL who voted. And my special thanks to all who made the vote successful.
> 
> I have appended a draft of the cover letter I plan to send to the Board tomorrow.  This letter has been reviewed in the NCSG Executive and the NCSG Policy committee.  I know this is a quick rush for review, but I really do need to get the material submitted before Brussels and this has been a very long haul.  If anyone does have time and does comment, I would appreciate it.  I am sure there are some typos or worse.
> 
> Thanks again.
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> <IMAGE.jpg>