Status of VI WG Efforts

[Rosemary Sinclair]

I agree - I'm just reading it now! It's really helpful

 

Cheers

 

Rosemary

 

Rosemary Sinclair

Managing Director, ATUG

Chairman, INTUG

T: +61 2 94958901  F: +61 2 94193889

M: +61 413734490 

Email: rosemary.sinclair at atug.org.au
<mailto:rosemary.sinclair at atug.org.au> 

Skype: rasinclair

 

Please visit the ATUG website for Updates and Information 
www.atug.com.au 

 

________________________________

From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of
Mary Wong
Sent: Wednesday, 21 July 2010 4:31 PM
To: NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Subject: Re: Status of VI WG Efforts

 

I urge everyone to read Milton's blog post (below) - it really does give
a good sense of where things stand in the Working Group, and for those
members who have not been following the vertical integration issue
closely, provides an excellent place to catch up!

 

Cheers

Mary 

 

Mary W S Wong

Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs

Franklin Pierce Law Center

Two White Street

Concord, NH 03301

USA

Email: mwong at piercelaw.edu

Phone: 1-603-513-5143

Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php

Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network
(SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584



>>> 

From: 

Milton L Mueller <mueller at SYR.EDU>

To:

<NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>

Date: 

7/20/2010 9:24 AM

Subject: 

Re: Status of VI WG Efforts

I just blogged about this. It's a short summary but gives you all the
essence. 

http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2010/7/20/4582700.html


 

 

From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of
Debra Hughes
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 8:47 AM
To: NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Subject: [NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS] Status of VI WG Efforts

 

Can someone in the VI WG provide an update on how things are going?
There is a lot of traffic on the Council list indicating that it is
possible the WG may not have consensus on important points before the
Board meeting in September.  I think many would agree that allowing the
current language in DAG4 to remain unchanged is problematic.

I certainly hope the single registrant/private registry exception has
support.  As I mentioned in Brussels, this exclusion is important for
not-for-profit organizations or other entities that may consider a new
gTLD for purposes that are not driven by a profit motive, but rather, to
create a safer place to execute its mission or to deliver its services.
Many companies and not-for-profit organizations that are considering new
gTLDs may not intend to offer registrations to the public.

Thanks,
Debbie

 

Debra Y. Hughes l Senior Counsel

American Red Cross

Office of the General Counsel 

2025 E Street, NW 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Phone: (202) 303-5356 

Fax: (202) 303-0143

HughesDeb at usa.redcross.org <mailto:HughesDeb at usa.redcross.org> 

 


  <http://www.piercelaw.edu/> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20100721/a162b205/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 14408 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20100721/a162b205/attachment.jpg>