motion on Chatham
David Cake
dave at DIFFERENCE.COM.AU
Thu Jan 28 03:49:54 CET 2010
At 5:09 PM -0800 27/1/10, Robin Gross wrote:
>I'm not so keen on the amendment re: Chatham House rule. I don't
>like the idea that the review teams can decide its a secret and its
>a secret. Its too easy and there is no limitation on what they can
>decide is an exceptional circumstance.
The Chatham house rule means that nothing that is said is
secret, only who said it. If, in some peoples discomfort with the
Chatham house rule, we end up giving review teams the option to use
more restrictive rules, that would be a poor outcome.
Cheers
David
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list