[ncsg-policy] Re: Vertical integration charter

[Joly MacFie]

+1 on behalf of ISOC-NY

joly

On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

>  OK, it looks as if all the feedback I've gotten favors the more
> delimited, policy determination objective.
> If there are any dissenting voices please speak up, otherwise Avri and I
> will report to the DT that we (NCUC/NCSG) favor the first version of
> Objective 5.
> --MM
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Non-Commercial User Constituency [NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Brenden Kuerbis [bkuerbis at INTERNETGOVERNANCE.ORG]
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 21, 2010 12:05 PM
> *To:* NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] [ncsg-policy] Re: Vertical integration
> charter
>
>  +1, it is best to limit the scope of the PDP as best we can
>
> ---------------------------------------
> Brenden Kuerbis
> Internet Governance Project
> http://internetgovernance.org
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Mary Wong <MWong at piercelaw.edu> wrote:
>
>>  I agree and support Milton's and Avri's version, particularly in view of
>> the very tight time frame the PDP will take place in.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Mary
>>
>>  *Mary W S Wong*
>> Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
>> Franklin Pierce Law Center
>> Two White Street
>> Concord, NH 03301
>> USA
>> Email: mwong at piercelaw.edu
>> Phone: 1-603-513-5143
>> Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
>> Selected writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN)
>> at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>
>>
>> >>>
>>     *From: * William Drake <william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch>  *To:* NCUC
>> Members List <NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU>, NCSG-Policy <
>> ncsg-policy at n4c.eu>  *Date: * 2/21/2010 6:30 AM  *Subject: * [ncsg-policy]
>> Re: Vertical integration charter
>>  Hi
>>
>>  On Feb 21, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>>
>>    My version, on the other hand, simply asks the WG to make a
>> determination whether the staff deviated from existing policy/practices in
>> drafting the contract. That is a more objective, well-defined and less
>> open-ended objective and can be completed in a reasonable period of time.
>>
>>     Therefore, I am asking for your support so that Avri and I can
>> legitimate tell the Drafting Team that NCUC/NCSG support the first version
>> of Objective 5.
>>
>>
>>  Of course.  Our point was always to set in place a coherent and reasoned
>> framework to replace decision making based on staff fiat, not to slow down
>> new gTLDs.
>>
>>  Bill
>>
>
>


--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie  917 442 8665 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
---------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20100221/ed246379/attachment.html>