Draft Statement of NCUC on the Draft Applicant Guidebook

[Kim G. von Arx]

Ditto.

Kim


On 10 Dec 2010, at 11:43, Drake William wrote:

> Sure
> 
> Bill
> 
> On Dec 10, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Robin Gross wrote:
> 
>> Here's the draft NCUC statement on the DAG and new gtlds.  Please let me know if you support it's submission.
>> 
>> Thanks! 
>> 
>> Robin
>> 
>> 
>> Draft Statement of NCUC on the Draft Applicant Guidebook
>> 
>> NCUC supports the prompt introduction of new gTLDs, yet we are deeply concerned about a number of implementation proposals in the latest Draft Applicant Guidebook, however believe they can be fixed and the new TLD process can move forward.
>> 
>> In particular, we are concerned that the Independent Objector (IO) process is ripe for abuse and harmful to the public interest. The IO was a staff created policy that was never discussed let alone approved by the GNSO.  We believe that it is entirely illogical that there can be a TLD that no community, religion, government, company, trademark holder, or individual in the world actually objects to – yet is “something we all agree is objectionable” as claimed by staff.
>> 
>> Important safeguards to prevent abuse and “gaming” are lacking from the IO, as envisioned by staff.  For example, there is no requirement that an objection brought by the IO be tied to at least one specific party who claims it will be harmed if the TLD goes forward.  Such a requirement is necessary to achieve accountability in the new TLD process.  
>> 
>> Another feature missing from staff’s version of an IO is transparency.  ICANN staff has stated a number of times that the IO is intended to provide a secret means for governments to object to a TLD string without having to do so publicly.  For a public governance organization with transparency requirements, such a proposal for secret objections cannot stand.  If there must be an IO, actual objectors must come forward and be transparent about their role to prevent the new TLD. 
>> 
>> According the staff memo on so-called Morality and Public Order objections, one of the purposes of the IO is “risk mitigation” to ICANN (i.e. a forum to quietly kill controversial TLDs to ward-off ICANN’s ability to be sued in courts of law).  We do not support staff’s introduction of “risk mitigation strategy” as ICANN’s primary policy objective.  As always, the global public interest with respect to the DNS is ICANN’s primary obligation, not ICANN’s own corporate interest.
>> 
>> As designed by staff, the IO lacks true independence.  The IO is employed by ICANN; likewise the company who provides the expert advice is also hired by ICANN, so there is a lack of neutrality on the part of the expert panel since they have an incentive to agree with the IO (ICANN) who hired it when they handle matters brought by the IO. 
>> 
>> On the issue of trademarks in the latest DAG, we are troubled by the elimination of sufficient time in which to respond to URS complaints in the latest DAG.  Re-working the negotiated community consensus from 21 to 14 days as a timeframe in which to respond is concerning as it provides inadequate protection to registrants, who may be on holidays and unable to find an attorney and respond in a reasonable period of time.
>> 
>> We share the concerns expressed in the At-Large Statement on Draft Applicant Guidebook.  However, we believe the best course of action is to make the appropriate fixes to the policy to protect the global public interest and go forward with new TLDs in an expeditious manner.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> <NCSG stmt on rec6>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> IP JUSTICE
>> Robin Gross, Executive Director
>> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
>> p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
>> w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin at ipjustice.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> IP JUSTICE
>> Robin Gross, Executive Director
>> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
>> p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
>> w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin at ipjustice.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> ***********************************************************
> William J. Drake
> Senior Associate
> Centre for International Governance
> Graduate Institute of International and
>  Development Studies
> Geneva, Switzerland
> william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch
> www.williamdrake.org
> ***********************************************************
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20101210/1533a10b/attachment-0001.html>