Dynamic Coallition on ICANN Accountability and International Conformity - IAIC at IGF?

[Fouad Bajwa]

Thank you Lehrstuhl!

What I have seen through this plenary no 3 of www.eurodig.org in
general is that they left out the major stakeholders in the debate on
post JPA ICANN World and it is necessary to realize that a Dynamic
Coalition isn't a really participatory coalition without participation
from all the three stakeholders Govts, Private and Civil Society
members so we need to mobilize more EU multistakeholders to join in to
this. Do you have access to the Council of Europe members to help
stimulate such a coalition together in the IGF and during their
participation in other forums?

What do you think?

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Lehrstuhl Weber <lst.weber at rwi.uzh.ch> wrote:
> Having been involved as panelist in the EuroDig plenary session, as you
> know, I would like to support your idea.
> Rolf
>
> Fouad Bajwa schrieb:
>>
>> Dear Members,
>>
>> As per the proceedings of the EuroDIG.org plenary no 3 on The Post-JPA
>> Phase: towards a future Internet Governance Model, there has been
>> discussion amongst the European Governments and participants about the
>> role of ICANN and more accountability of it in terms of Internet
>> Governance Forum. There has a need been identified for creation of a
>> "Dynamic Coallition on ICANN Accountability and International
>> Conformity - IAIC" (though proposed in its structure here more
>> sensibly) at the IGF in order to deal with the ICANN related issues
>> more strategically, tactically with a multistakeholder participation
>> within the light of the Tunis Agenda or if not within this context but
>> then realizing that  although ICANNs constitutional documents and
>> by-laws require it to co-operate with relevant international
>> organisations and to carry out its activities in conformity with
>> relevant principles of international law and applicable international
>> conventions and local law, there are no related formal accountability
>> arrangements and this can be the first step to create this process.
>>
>> IGF process needs to be kept separate but interconnected with ICANN
>> (though this comment is still very vague).
>>
>> Your suggestions on this proposal would be really useful and I am
>> circulating this to other IG related lists for input and
>> participation.
>>
>> --
>> Regards.
>> --------------------------
>> Fouad Bajwa
>> @skBajwa
>> Answering all your technology questions
>> http://www.askbajwa.com
>> http://twitter.com/fouadbajwa
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATVDW1tDZzA
>>
>



-- 
Regards.
--------------------------
Fouad Bajwa
@skBajwa
Answering all your technology questions
http://www.askbajwa.com
http://twitter.com/fouadbajwa
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATVDW1tDZzA