special trademark issues in new gtlds

[Konstantinos Komaitis]

Hello Leslie,

That is fantastic. The chinese perspective is important – especially the
lessons from the dispute resolution system concerning .cn – also in relation
to the clearinghouse. You will bring another perspective to the group and
this is very important.

Konstantinos


On 22/10/2009 03:56, "asmartlawyer" <asmartlawyer at 126.COM> wrote:

>  
> Dear All,
>  
> How are you? 
> This is Leslie, one of ICANN Seoul Fellows, I have an interest to work on
> trademark issues for NCUC in the new gtld policy that ICANN is developing. I'm
> well content to apply for volunteering to represent NCUC to participate on a
> GNSO Work Team on"special trademark issues"that remain unresolved from the IRT
> Report. I want to give my opinion on Trademark Clearinghouse in the
> perspective of comparative studies on China trademark law and Common Law
> trademark rights. I hope I can help, and I am looking forward to seeing all of
> you in Seoul!!
>  
> Warm regards,
> Leslie (Guan Yuanyuan)
> China
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Dear All,
> 
> It looks like the new GNSO group to deal with "special trademark issues"
> (formerly known as "IRT") is getting up and running.  It also looks like each
> constituency will appoint 2-3 people to serve on this group and that much of
> its work will be done in Seoul next week.
> 
> http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg07701.html
> http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg07709.html
> 
> We should begin to formulate our constituency response as soon as possible.
> 
> I understand there are a number of changes in the trademark policies in the
> DAGv3 from previous versions.   Now it is in the hands of the GNSO members
> until 14 December to work through the unresolved issues.   This will be an
> important topic at the GNSO sessions on the weekend, so we should try to have
> our position formulated before then to the extent possible.  We will spend
> some time on Constituency Day discussing these issues, but that is too late to
> be useful for participants in the weekend sessions.
> 
> It would be very helpful if those members of the constituency who have
> reviewed the new DAG v3 could provide the rest of us with some guidance on how
> NCUC should respond moving forward in light of the Board's letter to the GNSO.
> 
> Especially those who would like to represent NCUC in this new GNSO work group,
> can you please provide us with some understanding of what the issues are that
> remain and what NCUC's position should be on those issues?
> 
> Thank you very much!
> 
> Best,
> Robin
> 
> 
> IP JUSTICE
> Robin Gross, Executive Director
> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
> p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
> w: http://www.ipjustice.org <http://www.ipjustice.org/>      e:
> robin at ipjustice.org
>  
>  
> 
> 
> "雪见"杨幂邀你共品3D国韵网游《天下贰》，海报免费领
> <http://allyes.nie.163.com/main/adfclick?db=afanie&bid=1258,613,23&cid=147,4,1
> &sid=1355&show=ignore&url=http://tx2.163.com/fab.html>

-- 
Dr. Konstantinos Komaitis,
Lecturer in Law,
GigaNet Membership Chair,
University of Strathclyde,
The Lord Hope Building,
141 St. James Road,
Glasgow, G4 0LT,
UK
tel: +44 (0)141 548 4306
email: k.komaitis at strath.ac.uk 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20091024/34e06746/attachment.html>