raising awareness of stakeholder group charter injustices

[Rafik Dammak]

Hello Robin,

you can count on me. the action plan will be continued after the end of
public comments?

Rafik


2009/7/11 Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org>

> I remain in shock over the Board SIC (staff's) treatment of the Stakeholder
> Group Charters and wonder if anyone from the board was even paying attention
> to what staff did with the Commercial Stakeholder Group Charter.
>
> In particular, under the SIC approved charter<http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/csg-proposed-petition-charter-22jun09.pdf> for
> the CSG, they are going to allow any of the existing members of the IPR,
> ISP, and Commercial Constituencies VETO any board vote creating a new
> commercial constituency in the CSG.  Amazing!  The press should be having a
> field day with this level of incompetence and favoritism.
>
> "4.2 Membership shall also be open to any additional constituency
> recognised by ICANN’s Board under its by-laws, provided that such
> constituency, as determined by the unanimous consent of the signatories to
> this charter, is representative of commercial user interests which for the
> purposes of definition are distinct from and exclude registry and
> prospective registry, registrar, re-seller or other domain name supplier
> interests."
>
> We (noncommercial users) have really been asleep at the wheel over the last
> year while the ICANN Board of Directors had their heads filled with
> mis-representations about NCUC by relentless back-door lobbying.  They get
> it from the commercial/IPR crowd and they get it from staff, neither of whom
> want to see noncommercial users effective in policy development.   The fact
> that we haven't engaged in backdoor lobbying the way our critics do is
> coming back to haunt us by ICANN trying to take away our newly won 3 elected
> council seats for noncommercial users and staff imposing its "stranglehold"
> charter while ignoring all of work we did to develop one that was supported
> by global civil society (63 organizations + dozens of individuals in public
> comments).
>
> We must push-back against ICANN injustice to get them to listen to
> noncommercial users and to stop developing policy through backdoor
> negotiations while ignoring the expressed will of the public and a bottom-up
> process.
>
> ICANN is accepting public comments until 21 July on their imposed charter,
> so we have to weigh in loudly on their failure to follow bottom-up processes
> and allow noncommercial users to govern themselves.  More info on comment
> period:  http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#stakeholder
>
> [Considering the simple fact that not a single comment was taken into
> account by ICANN in the April comment period, one must ask oneself, "what is
> the point in commenting again?"  But we have to keep up the pressure and at
> least alert the public of ICANN squeezing out noncommercial users in policy
> development].
>
> We must raise awareness of this injustice to noncommercial users in the
> next few weeks, including awareness with the press and political figures.
> Are there any volunteers to work in a small task force with me to raise
> awareness (help with blogs, press releases, email lists, etc.) in the coming
> weeks? -- please let me know asap.
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> Best,
> Robin
>
> IP JUSTICE
> Robin Gross, Executive Director
> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
> p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
> w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin at ipjustice.org
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20090712/29e84440/attachment.html>