Fwd: [council] GNSO letter to the ICANN Board regarding Public Participation
Adam Peake
ajp at GLOCOM.AC.JP
Thu Feb 5 05:45:42 CET 2009
>Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII
>Content-Description: HTML
>
>In addition to Adam's suggestion (extract
>below), how would folks feel about adding
>something along the lines of "It is also
>important to bear in mind that these
>communications should complement, and not
>substitute for, direct public engagement with
>the ICANN Board."
>
>Please note that comments can be submitted only
>up till 11.59 tonight (I am assuming this is
>either PST or EST - can anyone confirm it?)
>
23:59 UTC.
Bill's email said:
At 11:37 AM +0100 2/4/09, William Drake wrote:
>
>Do NCUC people have any comments on the attached
>letter? if so they're due by 23:59 UTC today.
>I'll be offline traveling so if yes please send
>to Carlos or Mary.
>
>BD
>
I hope someone submitted the changes (now about 5 hours beyond the deadline.)
Adam
>Cheers
>Mary
>
>Mary W S Wong
>Professor of Law
>Franklin Pierce Law Center
>Two White Street
>Concord, NH 03301
>USA
>Email: <mailto:mwong at piercelaw.edu>mwong at piercelaw.edu
>Phone: 1-603-513-5143
>Webpage:
><http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php>http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
>Selected writings available on the Social
>Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
><http://ssrn.com/author=437584>http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>
>
>>>> Adam Peake <ajp at GLOCOM.AC.JP> 2/4/2009 11:57 AM >>>
>Important that the person asking has the
>opportunity to agree to having their question
>taken in that way.
>
>Perhaps add a sentence so the relevant part reads:
>
>It is also noted that ICANN staff, under
>direction of the Chairman, allowed for questions
>to be posted after the Meeting and subsequently
>answered by appropriate staff. The GNSO Council
>applauds this innovation particularly with the
>staff providing responses to direct questions.
>*However, questions should only be deferred in
>this way with the agreement of the person asking
>the question during the open forum.*
>
>Make sense?
>
>Adam
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list