Fwd: [council] GNSO letter to the ICANN Board regarding Public Participation

[Milton L Mueller]

I would support Avri's statement for the most part. My only quibble would be to be careful about this: " ICANN staff, under direction of the Chairman, allowed for questions to be posted after the Meeting and subsequently answered by appropriate staff."

While obviously staff should answer questions directed to them, i would not want to encourage ICANN to treat this kind of staff mediation as a _substitute_ for direct interaction with the Board at Public Forums

Milton Mueller
Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
XS4All Professor, Delft University of Technology
------------------------------
Internet Governance Project:
http://internetgovernance.org<http://internetgovernance.org/>



________________________________
From: Non-Commercial User Constituency [mailto:NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of William Drake
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 5:38 AM
To: NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: [council] GNSO letter to the ICANN Board regarding Public Participation

Do NCUC people have any comments on the attached letter?  if so they're due by 23:59 UTC today.  I'll be offline traveling so if yes please send to Carlos or Mary.

BD

Begin forwarded message:

From: Avri Doria <avri at acm.org<mailto:avri at acm.org>>
Date: February 3, 2009 5:27:35 PM GMT+01:00
To: GNSO Council <council at gnso.icann.org<mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
Subject: RE: [council] GNSO letter to the ICANN Board regarding Public Participation
Reply-To: avri at acm.org<mailto:avri at acm.org>

Updated version of the letter.

a.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20090204/d856b8ba/attachment.html>