Fwd: [gnso-sti] Public Comment: STI Report on Trademark Protection in New gTLDs

[Robin Gross]

Since the STI Report unanimously passed on the GNSO Council today, it  
now goes to the public comment period.

Public comments are open and will be accepted until 26 January 2010  
(see ICANN announcement below).

Thanks,
Robin

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen at icann.org>
> Date: December 17, 2009 2:54:40 PM PST
> To: "gnso-sti at icann.org" <gnso-sti at icann.org>
> Subject: [gnso-sti] Public Comment: STI Report on Trademark  
> Protection in New gTLDs
>
>
> [To: gnso-sti at icann.org]
> [To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org
> [To: liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org; council[at]gnso.icann.org]
>
> http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-17dec09-en.htm
> Public Comment: STI Report on Trademark Protection in New gTLDs
>
> 17 December 2009
> The Special Trademarks Issues Working Team (STI) has published its  
> Report on its recommendations to create a Trademark Clearinghouse  
> and Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure to protect trademarks in the  
> New GTLD Program. The public comment period ends on 26 January 2010.
> http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201001.htm#sti
>
> Special Trademark Issues Review Team Recommendations [PDF, 272K]
> http://gnso.icann.org/issues/sti/sti-wt-recommendations-11dec09-en.pdf
>
> You can also find this report at http://gnso.icann.org/issues/.
>
> Background
>
> On 12 October 2009, the ICANN Board sent a letter [PDF, 736K] to  
> the GNSO requesting its review of the policy implications of  
> certain trademark protection mechanisms proposed for the New gTLD  
> Program, as described in the Draft Applicant Guidebook (http:// 
> www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/draft-rfp-clean-04oct09-en.pdf  
> [PDF, 198K]) and accompanying memoranda. Specifically, the Board  
> Letter requested that the GNSO provide input on whether it approves  
> the proposed staff model , or, in the alternative, the GNSO could  
> propose an alternative that is equivalent or more effective and  
> implementable.
>
> In response, t he GNSO adopted a resolution creating the Special  
> Trademarks Issues review team (STI) on 28 October 2009, which  
> included representatives from each Stakeholder Group ; At-Large;  
> Nominating Committee Appointees; and the Government Advisory  
> Committee, to analyze the specific rights protection mechanisms  
> that have been proposed for inclusion in the Draft Applicant  
> Guidebook. The STI delivered to the GNSO Council its Report [PDF,  
> 272K], which describes an alternative model that the STI believes  
> is more effective and implementable than the model proposed in the  
> Draft Applicant Guidebook version 3. The GNSO Council unanimously  
> approved the recommendations contained in the STI Report for public  
> comment and consideration by ICANN when it finalizes the proposed  
> model for trademark protection in the New gTLD Program.
>
> For additional information on the new gTLD Program: http:// 
> www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/related-en.htm.
>
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat
> gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org
> http://gnso.icann.org
>
>
>




IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin at ipjustice.org



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20091217/f43a033f/attachment.html>