Draft of the NCSG proposal for the membership criteria

[Fouad Bajwa]

Hi Avri,

I know I am a bit below the understandable level but I am always happy
to see with a few exchanges of comments we do reach an understanding!

Once again Avri, thank you for considering my comment.

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Avri Doria <avri at ltu.se> wrote:
> On 17 Dec 2009, at 12:15, Fouad Bajwa wrote:
>
>> A bit of misperception, I have not quoted that anywhere. Both
>> registrants are equal with/to non-registrants.
>
> On 17 Dec 2009, at 12:21, Fouad Bajwa wrote:
>
>> Here is a bit of modified version to clarify what I mentioned earlier
>> with a point 4 added that can replace point number 3, secondly a
>> developing world perspective may be very different from perspectives
>> comming or being decided in the developed world:
>
>
> Thank you.  Now I understand your point.  I am just a little bit slow this morning.
>
> I will make sure the point is reviewed the NCSG-EC in their considerations.  Thanks for the comment, and especially for the recommend language.
>
> I would also like to hear from others related to your recommended language change.
>
> Thanks
>
> a.
>



-- 
Regards.
--------------------------
Fouad Bajwa
Advisor & Researcher
ICT4D & Internet Governance
Member Multistakeholder Advisory Group (IGF)
Member Civil Society Internet Governance Caucus (IGC)
My Blog: Internet's Governance
http://internetsgovernance.blogspot.com/
Follow my Tweets:
http://twitter.com/fouadbajwa
MAG Interview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATVDW1tDZzA