latest version of vertical integration statement

Adam Peake ajp at GLOCOM.AC.JP
Thu Aug 27 18:01:12 CEST 2009


Suggest deleting:

"It is ridiculous for anyone to contend that this 
is not a significant change in policy."

Sentence is superfluous, all very adequately 
explained in the sentence that follows:

"Policy changes of this magnitude applicable to 
gTLDs must go through the GNSO; that is required 
by ICANN bylaws."

Adam



At 10:50 AM -0400 8/27/09, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>attached as pdf.
>
>Milton Mueller
>Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
>XS4All Professor, Delft University of Technology
>------------------------------
>Internet Governance Project:
>http://internetgovernance.org
>
>Content-Type: application/pdf; name="NCUC-Ry-Rr-vertical.pdf"
>Content-Description: NCUC-Ry-Rr-vertical.pdf
>Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="NCUC-Ry-Rr-vertical.pdf";
>	size=23815; creation-date="Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:45:42 GMT";
>	modification-date="Thu, 27 Aug 2009 10:45:42 GMT"
>
>Attachment converted: Macintosh 
>HD:NCUC-Ry-Rr-vertical.pdf (PDF /«IC») (00A320A1)


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list