[Fwd: Clarifications Regarding Staff Summary-Analysis of Stakeholder Group Charter Public Forum]

[Robin Gross]

Katitza,

I agree with your suggestion.  We can note in the letter all of the
names of the organizations and individuals who had previously
commented on this issue.  There seems to have been serious disconnect
between the facts of this situation and the "facts" that the board
members were given by staff.  The decision was entirely engineered to
have a single result and we need to show that.

Cedric,

Thanks very much for volunteering to take the first stab at drafting
this letter.  We can discuss it in more detail at the NCUC
constituency call tomorrow, so you know more specifics about what to
include in it.

Thanks,
Robin

On Aug 9, 2009, at 12:00 PM, Katitza Rodriguez wrote:

> Dear Bill:
>
>>
>> Interesting parallel: I asked Rob in a GNSO council meeting, and
>> reiterated in my submission to the public comment period, that
>> statements made in support of the NCUC version by NCUC members and
>> hundreds (counting the Internet Governance Caucus etc) of external
>> supporters in the public comment period ending 15 April be taken
>> into account in the summary of the PC ending 23 July.  The reasons
>> for doing so were straightforward: there was no reason to believe
>> that the organizations and individuals that said they supported
>> the NCUC model and therefore rejected the opposite model had
>> changed their positions,  so they should not be required to all
>> mobilize and restate their stances a couple months later, in the
>> summer travel season (although some did).  The suggestion was not
>> acted upon or even mentioned in the staff summary.
>
>
> We need to write a letter to the Chairman of the Board and all the
> Board Members explaining:
>
> a. NCUC proposal & the support it got (signatures orgs +
> individuals + coalitions).
> b. Explain why we consider there were not a bottom up approach (and
> how we get ignore it).
> c. Would be nice to analyzed the ICANN's last proposal and attached
> comments to it.
>
> We do not need to ask for more signatures. We need to attached
> those signatures we already collect and enforce what we already
> request. I am pretty sure that many board members are not aware of
> our NCUC process to get consensus on documents. how the NCUC
> proposal were discussed in different mailing lists, nor how NGOs
> get their consensus through their own organizations structures/
> memberships/coalitions, etc.
>
> My two cents. Unfortunately, I am not able to help right now as I
> am very busy. But Cedric Laurant has volunteer to write the letter
> if NCUC Steering Committee agree on this.
>
> Best,
>
> Katitza




IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin at ipjustice.org



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20090810/2af1c4b5/attachment.html>