[Fwd: Clarifications Regarding Staff Summary-Analysis of Stakeholder Group Charter Public Forum]

[Katitza Rodriguez]

Dear Bill, All

I have little time but I could work with Cedric on this letter if you
agree. But I am open to hear other strategics. Then, we could go to
the ombudsman. Happy to work on it, too.
Katitza

On Aug 9, 2009, at 3:00 PM, Katitza Rodriguez wrote:

> Dear Bill:
>
>>
>> Interesting parallel: I asked Rob in a GNSO council meeting, and
>> reiterated in my submission to the public comment period, that
>> statements made in support of the NCUC version by NCUC members and
>> hundreds (counting the Internet Governance Caucus etc) of external
>> supporters in the public comment period ending 15 April be taken
>> into account in the summary of the PC ending 23 July.  The reasons
>> for doing so were straightforward: there was no reason to believe
>> that the organizations and individuals that said they supported the
>> NCUC model and therefore rejected the opposite model had changed
>> their positions,  so they should not be required to all mobilize
>> and restate their stances a couple months later, in the summer
>> travel season (although some did).  The suggestion was not acted
>> upon or even mentioned in the staff summary.
>
>
> We need to write a letter to the Chairman of the Board and all the
> Board Members explaining:
>
> a. NCUC proposal & the support it got (signatures orgs + individuals
> + coalitions).
> b. Explain why we consider there were not a bottom up approach (and
> how we get ignore it).
> c. Would be nice to analyzed the ICANN's last proposal and attached
> comments to it.
>
> We do not need to ask for more signatures. We need to attached those
> signatures we already collect and enforce what we already request. I
> am pretty sure that many board members are not aware of our NCUC
> process to get consensus on documents. how the NCUC proposal were
> discussed in different mailing lists, nor how NGOs get their
> consensus through their own organizations structures/memberships/
> coalitions, etc.
>
> My two cents. Unfortunately, I am not able to help right now as I am
> very busy. But Cedric Laurant has volunteer to write the letter if
> NCUC Steering Committee agree on this.
>
> Best,
>
> Katitza

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20090809/9a309018/attachment.html>