Operation "Clear Light of Day"
Robin Gross
robin at IPJUSTICE.ORG
Tue Aug 4 19:58:55 CEST 2009
Dear all,
The preliminary meeting notes from last week's ICANN Board Meeting
(where it defied noncommercial users and voted 10-4 to impose the
very structure on noncommercial users that harm noncommercial
interests) seem to indicate that the board had little debate and no
information from actual noncommercial users about the issue it was
voting on. No NCUC materials were given to the board and our
comments to raise concerns are discounted by calling them "a letter
writing campaign". ICANN staff and SIC leaders managed the entire
"show" and thinks it will not have to re-evaluate its decision for
another year.
But we should file for an immediate reconsideration of the fait-de-
complis decision and insist that the full board hear from actual
noncommercial users directly (not SIC/staff's mischaracterizations).
And we should take the managed decision and rigged process to the
ombudsman to help build the public record and to require further
explanation from ICANN.
A few key questions need to be answered: Why did SIC leaders and
staff table a NCSG charter for board adoption that did not have a
single comment in favor of it from any noncommercial organization
(and 80+ noncommercial orgs and individuals strongly against it)?
How has ICANN taken public comments from noncommercial users into
account in this kangaroo proceeding?
This contrived decision cannot withstand the Clear Light of Day being
shone on it.
Robin
http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/prelim-report-30jul09.htm
......
B. Regular Agenda
From the Structural Improvements Committee regarding GNSO Improvements
Stakeholder Group Charters
The Board discussed the public comments received regarding the
proposed Stakeholder Group Charter for the Non Commercial Stakeholder
Group and the opposition raised by some of the members of the current
Non Commercial Users Constituency, and discussed the need to clearly
state that the period of time for which the transitional charter will
remain in effect and that, upon reevaluation after the transitional
period, the Board will reevaluate in full, including but not limited
to the continued need for a constituency-based model. The Board
received an update from Staff regarding the necessity for all
proposed charters to be approved together to allow for the GNSO to
move forward and seat the new council in Seoul.
The Board then took the following action:
Whereas, the Board determined at its May 2009 meeting that most of
the New GNSO Stakeholder Group Charters required revisions to ensure
equitable participation and representation by new Constituencies and
alignment with the Board-approved GNSO Improvements Report;
Whereas, the Board’s Structural Improvements Committee (SIC)
developed, posted, and discussed with the community revised SG
Charter documents;
Whereas, the Staff has made further administrative and substantive
edits to conform the documents with the SIC’s intention s, to address
additional community comments and to resolve various, non-substantive
typographical, form and style changes;
It is RESOLVED (2009.30.07.09), the Board approves each of the
Charters of the Registries Stakeholder Group, The Registrars
Stakeholder Group, The Commercial Stakeholder Group and the Non-
Commercial Stakeholder Group as revised by the Structural
Improvements Committee (copies of which accompany this resolution).
The Board also approves additional charter elements to ensure the
Bylaws principles of transparency, openness, fairness and
representativeness and each Stakeholder Group is further directed to
incorporate those additional charter elements into its permanent
charter document at its earliest opportunity.
The Board will re-examine the Stakeholder Group structures and their
operations in one year and, thereafter, every three years to assure
adherence to the ICANN Bylaws principles.
In view of this resolution, the Board directs the Staff to re-
initiate its work with the GNSO Constituency leaders to complete any
necessary additional work on the re-confirmation of their existing
charters (consistent with the principles and elements adopted with
respect to the Stakeholder Group Charters) so that the
Board can act on those documents at its September special meeting.
Ten of the Board members present approved of this resolution. Three
Board members opposed the resolution. The resolution passed.
Another Board Member who was not present at the time of the vote but
was present later in the meeting, also asked that her dissent and
asked that it be placed on the record regarding the board’s role in
making appointments.
......
IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: robin at ipjustice.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20090804/4b87550f/attachment.html>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list