ICANN travel support

[Milton L Mueller]

Dear members

In what could prove to be an important change in ICANN policy, a new
travel support policy has been proposed. 

http://www.icann.org/topics/travel-support/draft-procedure-22may08.htm  

 

This policy is only a proposal and there is still debate about it. 

 

The essential features of the policy are:

1.      Eligibility: GNSO, ASO, ccNSO.  

2.      Administration. ICANN will directly pay for air travel, provide
reasonable reimbursement for other forms of travel (e.g. rail), and pay
a per diem to cover all other expenses (meals, lodging, sundries, taxis,
parking, etc.) Actual per diem amounts will be published for each
meeting, based on international standards.

3.      Budget. ICANN will allocate sufficient funds so that the Chair
and half of the remaining Council members will receive travel support.
So for the GNSO this covers 12 of 23 GNSO members (including liaisons).

4.      Allocation. SO Chair (or designated committee) to determine for
whom this travel support funding is to be used, based on best meeting
the policy-making needs of the entity so may include non-Council members
(by excluding further Council members). 

5.       Class of travel. To maximize participation, class of travel
will be economy, however the Chair will travel according to the same
policy as the Board. (For trips longer than five hours, Board member
travel is booked at Business class airfares. 

 

Some of us are concerned about the idea of covering only half the GNSO
Council members and requiring a committee or the chair to decide which
half. 

We will probably file some comments on this. Obviously the supplier
constituencies (registries and registrars) who view themselves as being
taxed to pay for flying around people who want to regulate them, oppose
any travel support, and the user constituencies tend to want all the
Council members to be supported. Your comments welcome.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20080606/7762226b/attachment.html>