Fwd: [council] Revised Proposed GNSO Council motion on Domain Tasting

[Robin Gross]

Hello there,

While we didn't vote on this issue today, we will probably vote on  
this text or a similar version on the 28th at our next meeting.   It  
is my understanding the Registrars and the Registries will not  
support any policy to curtail DNT (based on discussions today in the  
mtg).

Another possibility is just to END it all together.  Permitting a %  
of deletions as below, was in part, meant as a compromise with Ry and  
Rr, and since they won't support what is below, no point passing a  
motion with a compromise when you don't get the support desired.    
Certainly registrars would not be prevented from giving refunds  
within a time-frame if they wanted to (i.e. let the market deal with  
legitimate needs for refunds as happens in other services).

I'm still very keen to hear what other NCUC'rs think about how to  
move forward with Tasting.

Thanks,
Robin



Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette at cov.com>
> Date: February 12, 2008 7:29:18 AM PST
> To: <council at gnso.icann.org>
> Subject: [council] Revised Proposed GNSO Council motion on Domain  
> Tasting
>
> All,
>
> Attached please find a revised proposed GNSO Council motion on  
> domain tasting and redline that highlights the changes from the  
> previous motion.
>
> The primary changes are:
>
> 1.  Additional Whereas clauses to highlight how the design team  
> followed the terms of reference;
> 2.  Deletion of brackets around 10%;
> 3.  Deletion of the "speculative registration language"; and
> 4.  Addition of an "extraordinary circumstances" exemption that  
> carries with it a reporting requirement.
>
> Some comments:
>
> I do not yet have the IPC's instructions on this text, but do not  
> anticipate significant objections.  I believe that is true for  
> Mike, too.  The bracketed language reflects Tim's objection.  I  
> have left the language in for discussion proposes.  The reasoning  
> for the reporting requirement is that if a registrar experiences  
> such an extraordinary circumstance that it warrants exemption from  
> the application of consensus policy then it seems reasonable to  
> provide ICANN and the registrant community with the information  
> that the registrar is seeking an exemption and, if it is granted,  
> the basis for it.
>
> K
>
> <<02122008 revised DT Design team proposed GNSO Council tasting  
> motion - SCRUBBED on 02-12-08 09_58.DOC>> <<redline 02122008 DT  
> Design team proposed GNSO Council tasting motion - SCRUBBED on  
> 02-06-08 21_53-#.DOC>>
>




IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin at ipjustice.org



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20080213/09f4184e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 02122008 revised DT Design team proposed GNSO Council tasting motion - SCRUBBED on 02-12-08 09_58.DOC
Type: application/msword
Size: 51712 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20080213/09f4184e/attachment.doc>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: redline 02122008 DT Design team proposed GNSO Council tasting motion - SCRUBBED on 02-06-08 21_53-#.DOC
Type: application/msword
Size: 67072 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20080213/09f4184e/attachment-0001.doc>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20080213/09f4184e/attachment-0001.html>