US Govt Agrees with NCUC on ICANN's "Inappropriate" Plan to Police Morality and Public Order

[Milton L Mueller]

Well the news is partly good and partly bad. As a whole the letter seems
to be an attempt by NTIA to get ICANN to stop or delay for another 2
years or so any addition of new TLDs. We know that lots of
business/trademark lobbies have been complaining loudly about the new
gTLD process. While the paragraph cited by Robin does indeed agree with
our position, the general upshot is "back to square one." I would like
to solicit constituency comment: is this new gTLD process so bad that we
want to stop it altogether? In many ways this would have to be seen as a
massive failure - after 10 years, ICANN still cannot define an ongoing
process to add new TLDs? 

 

________________________________

From: Non-Commercial User Constituency
[mailto:NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU] On Behalf Of Robin Gross
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 1:49 AM
To: NCUC-DISCUSS at LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Subject: [NCUC-DISCUSS] US Govt Agrees with NCUC on ICANN's
"Inappropriate" Plan to Police Morality and Public Order

 

The US Govt submitted its comments to ICANN on the introduction of new
gTLDs. 

    http://forum.icann.org/lists/gtld-guide/msg00175.html

 

And the US Govt agreed with a point NCUC has been making throughout this
entire process.  The US suggests ICANN "Focus on coordinating technical
functions related to the management of the DNS and not on matters more
appropriately addressed by governments, such as adjudication of morality
and public order and the community objections in accordance with
international human rights law.  The proposed mechanisms are
inappropriate."

 

Interesting to say the least.

 

Best,

Robin

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20081220/d40416cf/attachment.html>