Fw: [gnso-pro-wg] Online polling results: summary

vmcevedy vmcevedy at NTLWORLD.COM
Wed May 9 10:54:52 CEST 2007


fyi

----- Original Message -----
From: "Liz Williams" <liz.williams at icann.org>
To: <gnso-pro-wg at icann.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 9:00 AM
Subject: [gnso-pro-wg] Online polling results: summary


> Colleagues
>
> Ahead of tonight's meeting, please review this link to the poll
> results.  http://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=umTLyTqHJjKfWqTxYwzL
>
> I am currently verifying some of the 41 respondents  to ensure the
> veracity of the responses.  The following caveats apply to the
> summary -- the 43 responses (41 online and 2 offline) is not a
> statistically significant sample of a defined group; the
> questionnaire was designed to elicit top line summary responses to a
> wide range of questions; no special preparation was made for the
> summary to follow robust survey methodology.
>
>
> Summary -- Section I
>
> More than half identified themselves as rights owner representatives
> or IPR owners; only 5 identified themselves as registrars or registries
>
> Note in question 6  that there is an almost even split between an IP
> claim and the use of sunrise registrations.
>
> Note that in question 7 the rights people sought to protect.
>
> Note in question 14 the even spilt between those respondents who
> owned or didn't own defensive registrations
>
> Of particular interest is the section on defensive registrations --
> note the low levels of defensive registrations as a percentage of
> domain name portfolios
>
> [[I did a random selection of the word "rainyweather" (because it's
> raining in Brussels today) on the MelbourneIT (because that came into
> my head first) website across info, .co.nz, .eu, .com.au, .org
> and .biz.  The prices of a one year registration are, for most of the
> TLDs, about $35 per year on that site.  It would be helpful to have
> some actual numbers on costs of registrations for a portfolio of
> registrations to see the cost impact of defensive registrations.]]
>
> Summary -- Section II
>
> Note the level of implementation budget expenditure on sunrise
> mechanisms and the other responses in that section which do not
> include many registrars and registries.
>
> Speak to you all on 9 May to resolve how to represent the materials
> in the Report.  I haven't seen any correspondence on proposed
> guidelines as yet.
>
> Liz
> .....................................................
>
> Liz Williams
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN - Brussels
> +32 2 234 7874 tel
> +32 2 234 7848 fax
> +32 497 07 4243 mob
>
>
>
>
>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list