Fwd: [gtld-council] GNSO PDP Dec 05: Dispute Resolution Models

Mawaki Chango ki_chango at YAHOO.COM
Fri Mar 16 17:32:43 CET 2007


FYI

--- Liz Williams <liz.williams at icann.org> wrote:

> To: gtld-council at gnso.icann.org
> From: Liz Williams <liz.williams at icann.org>
> Subject: [gtld-council] GNSO PDP Dec 05:  Dispute Resolution Models
> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:41:05 +0100
>
>
> Colleagues
>
> Further to a request  made during the Los Angeles meetings and a
> reminder on the GNSO Council call last night, please find attached a
> simplified chart which sets out a range of dispute resolution models
> and their application.  This chart should be read in conjunction with
> the draft Implementation Plan which is in the updated version of the
> draft Final Report.
>
> The purpose of the document is to facilitate further discussion of
> best practice dispute resolution models that could reasonably be used
> during the new TLDs application process.
>
> The Committee has discussed at length the system used by WIPO to
> resolve disputes about name registration.  The development of any
> dispute resolution model for the application could be based upon that
> which is used by WIPO but the purpose of any dispute resolution model
> in the new TLDs system is to resolve disputes between applicants or
> between applicants and ICANN.  It is not about name registration
> disputes which may appear after an applicant has established its
> registry operations.
>
> This is meant as the start point of discussions and we look forward
> to further discussion in Lisbon.
>
> Liz
> .....................................................
>
> Liz Williams
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN - Brussels
> +32 2 234 7874 tel
> +32 2 234 7848 fax
> +32 497 07 4243 mob
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ResolutionChart.doc
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 246784 bytes
Desc: pat1983536643
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20070316/69433b88/attachment.obj>


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list