Fwd: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] current proposal

[Mawaki Chango]

Within the framework of the PDP on the existing registry's
contractual conditions, the constituency's position is required BY
WEDNESDAY on the draft recommendation below.

My own position is positive.
Thanks,

Mawaki


--- Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

> To: PDPfeb06 <pdp-pcceg-feb06 at gnso.icann.org>
> From: Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>
> Subject: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] current proposal
> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 15:27:52 -0500
> 
> 
> 
> 
> In order to determine there is a need for a new consensus policy on
>  
> the use of registry data, including traffic data, for purposes
> other  
> then which is was collected, there is a need for a properly
> targeted  
> study by an independent third party on the data collected and the  
> uses to which it is put.  The study should provide appropriate  
> safeguards to protect any data provided  for the purposes of the  
> study, and the confidentiality of which registry provides which
> data.  
> The findings of the study should be published in an appropriately  
> transparent manner.
> 
> A SOW will be developed by the council, with appropriate public  
> review, to cover an analysis of the concerns, the collection and
> use  
> of data, and the non disciminatory acces to that data.
> 
> It is recommended that a current processes document be developed , 
> 
> describing the current practices of the collection of data, what
> the  
> data is used for, e.g. operating the registry; preparing marketing 
> 
> materials to promote registration of domain names; gathering of  
> ‘null’ returns, ensuring the integrity of the Registry, or the DNS,
>  
> etc. as example broad categories, and published as a
> guideline for Registry data collection and use.
> 
> 
> 
>