Fwd: [council] Summary of opposition to the WHOIS task force recommendation

[Milton Mueller]

Those are not "oppositions" to the OPoC they are implementation details
that the new WG is supposed to clear up.

>>> Mawaki Chango <ki_chango at YAHOO.COM> 4/12/2007 7:37 AM >>>
FYI

--- Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au> wrote:

> Subject: [council] Summary of opposition to the WHOIS task
> force recommendation
> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:10:57 +1000
> From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>
> To: "Council GNSO" <council at gnso.icann.org>
>
> Hello All,
>
> Here is a summary of the opposition to the WHOIS task force
> recommendation as discussed in Lisbon and presented at various
> forums:
>
> - Unclear on the scope responsibilities of the operational
> contact
>
> - No job description for operational contact
>
> - no timeframes by when the operational contact must respond
>
> - What happens if OPOC fails to meet responsibilities
>
> - Circumstances where admin and tech and full registrant
> information
> held by the registrar would be provided, and no standard way
> to access
>
> - Need more accurate admin and tech and full registrant
> information
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
>
>
>
>