Fwd: Re: [pdp-pcceg-feb06] comments on expert advice
Danny Younger
dannyyounger at YAHOO.COM
Wed Sep 20 15:13:18 CEST 2006
Horacio,
Allow me to supply some background on the issue of
"experts". Per PDP guidelines, the Contractual
Conditions Task Force put out a "Call for Experts" in
early April:
"ICANN and the GNSO are interested in seeking the
views of a range of different experts, in addition to
hearing from its formal Constituencies and seeking
public comments through the ICANN website. We would
be grateful if you could submit an expert opinion on
any or all of the items set out in the response
template below."
http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-11apr06.htm
No expert comments were submitted.
Not surprising, as most "experts" don't spend their
time perusing the GNSO website on a daily basis.
Three months later, the BC's Marilyn Cade begins
asserting that expert commentary is needed from
competition and anti-trust authorities. She puts
forward a series of names including that of Dr. Andrew
Odlyzko, University of Minn., USA.
Prior to assuming a position at the University of
Minnesota in 2001, Dr. Odlyzko devoted 26 years to
research and research management at Bell Telephone
Laboratories, AT&T Bell Labs, and AT&T Labs.
http://www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko/bio.html
This renewed call for experts is nothing more than a
thinly disguised attempt to buttress the views of the
BC.
If the TF accepts commentary from Dr. Odlyzko, then it
should certainly equally accept commentary from Milton
Mueller.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list