NCUC Policy Discussion Document

[Danny Younger]

Carlos,

Milton did a great job with the rewrite.  The only
bone of contention appears to be how to handle the
issue of renewals.  We should probably discuss this
one topic a bit further just so that whatever minority
view emerges is properly reflected in the document.

all the best,
Danny

--- Carlos Afonso <ca at RITS.ORG.BR> wrote:

> Danny, actually Milton did a rewrite, which looks
> good to me, and is 
> posted. Probably will save you time if you agree
> with his insertions/mods.
> 
> [] fraterno
> 
> --c.a.
> 
> Danny Younger wrote:
> > Milton,
> > 
> > Thank you for the input and the pointers to
> > established constituency positions.  I will begin
> the
> > re-write.
> > 
> > Best wishes,
> > Danny
> > 
> > --- Milton Mueller <Mueller at SYR.EDU> wrote:
> > 
> >> Danny:
> >> I'm impressed by your energy but very
> disappointed
> >> by your decision to
> >> completely alter established NCUC positions. 
> >>
> >> The constituency has over the course of the last
> 6
> >> months staked out a
> >> clear and consensual position on the renewal
> issue.
> >> You have completely
> >> abandoned that, despite no indications of support
> >> from others in the
> >> constituency, and come up with an entirely new
> and
> >> different position.
> >> The position is very complicated, based on ccTLD
> >> procedures, and takes
> >> the registrar constituency position on rebids. 
> >>
> >> That's not the way things can be done here.
> Please
> >> refer to the
> >> existing NCUC statement on renewal expectancy, 
> >>
> >
>
http://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0604&L=ncuc-discuss&T=0&O=D&X=6285946F42781A231F&Y=mueller%40syr.edu&P=6368
> >>
> >> and also to the notes of the NCUC meeting in
> >> Marrakech, drafted by
> >> Carlos. 
> >>
> >
>
http://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0606&L=ncuc-discuss&T=0&O=D&X=1988C02DA913349905&Y=mueller%40syr.edu&P=8740
> >>
> >> Any position must use these discussions and
> drafts
> >> as a starting point.
> >>
> >>
> >> The Marrakech meeting discussed these positions
> >> extensively. That was
> >> in fact the largest real-time grouping of
> >> constituency members in some
> >> time. It is unacceptable to trash that work.
> >>
> >> Please do not submit this report to the
> Rapporteur
> >> group, or to anyone
> >> else, otherwise the constituency will have to
> >> disavow it and that will
> >> make us all look ridiculous, and undermine your
> >> credibility in the
> >> process. 
> >>
> >> I have only read the renewal part. Since that was
> >> completely orthogonal
> >> to what we have discussed and written so far, I
> fear
> >> going any further.
> >> As time permits, I'll read the rest of it but
> can't
> >> say that I am
> >> looking forward to it. 
> >>
> >> Really, Danny, show some respect for the fact
> that
> >> this is a
> >> CONSTITUENCY that needs to develop positions as a
> >> group. 
> >>
> >>
> >>>>> Danny Younger <dannyyounger at YAHOO.COM>
> >> 10/17/2006 8:24 AM >>>
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> A formal NCUC Statement has been prepared
> covering
> >> the
> >> following topics:
> >>
> >> 1)  gTLD renewal policy
> >> 2)  policy for gtld Consensus Policy limitations
> >> 3)  gTLD price control policy
> >> 4)  policy for ICANN fees pertaining to gTLDs
> >> 5)  policy on the use of gTLD registry data 
> >> 6)  gTLD development/infrastructure investment
> >> policy
> >>
> >> This statement is attached as a twenty (20) page
> >> Word
> >> document.  The statement has already been
> forwarded
> >> to
> >> the NCUC Policy Committee for review and now
> awaits
> >> your constituency member comments, suggested
> >> modifications, and/or partial or complete
> revisions.
> >>
> >> Per the timetable established by Rapporteur
> Groups A
> >> &
> >> B, our final work-product must be submitted by 24
> >> October in order to be included in the Final
> Report
> >> submitted to the GNSO PDP Task Force on
> Contractual
> >> Conditions for Existing Registries.
> >>
> >> As the views of our constituency will not
> >> necessarily
> >> coincide with those expressed by other
> >> constituencies,
> >> it is important that a cogent Minority Report
> makes
> >> its way to the ICANN Board via the GNSO's Final
> >> Report.
> >>
> >> Each paragraph has been numbered for ease of
> >> discussion, and all member comments will be
> >> referenced
> >> in the final version of this document.
> >>
> >> I look forward to your assistance in properly
> >> presenting the NCUC view on these matters.
> >>
> >> Thank you for your assistance,
> >> Danny Younger
> >> isoc-ny
> >>
> >>
> __________________________________________________
> >> Do You Yahoo!?
> >> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> >> protection around 
> >> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around 
> > http://mail.yahoo.com 
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Carlos A. Afonso
> diretor de planejamento
> Rits - Rede de Informações para o Terceiro Setor
>
***************************************************************
> Projeto Sacix - Apoio técnico a iniciativas de
> inclusão digital
> com software livre, mantido pela Rits em colaboração
> com o
> Coletivo Digital. Para mais informações:
> www.sacix.org.br   www.rits.org.br  
> www.coletivodigital.org.br
>
***************************************************************
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com