NCUC Policy Discussion Document

Carlos Afonso ca at RITS.ORG.BR
Wed Oct 18 15:50:14 CEST 2006


Danny, actually Milton did a rewrite, which looks good to me, and is 
posted. Probably will save you time if you agree with his insertions/mods.

[] fraterno

--c.a.

Danny Younger wrote:
> Milton,
> 
> Thank you for the input and the pointers to
> established constituency positions.  I will begin the
> re-write.
> 
> Best wishes,
> Danny
> 
> --- Milton Mueller <Mueller at SYR.EDU> wrote:
> 
>> Danny:
>> I'm impressed by your energy but very disappointed
>> by your decision to
>> completely alter established NCUC positions. 
>>
>> The constituency has over the course of the last 6
>> months staked out a
>> clear and consensual position on the renewal issue.
>> You have completely
>> abandoned that, despite no indications of support
>> from others in the
>> constituency, and come up with an entirely new and
>> different position.
>> The position is very complicated, based on ccTLD
>> procedures, and takes
>> the registrar constituency position on rebids. 
>>
>> That's not the way things can be done here. Please
>> refer to the
>> existing NCUC statement on renewal expectancy, 
>>
> http://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0604&L=ncuc-discuss&T=0&O=D&X=6285946F42781A231F&Y=mueller%40syr.edu&P=6368
>>
>> and also to the notes of the NCUC meeting in
>> Marrakech, drafted by
>> Carlos. 
>>
> http://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0606&L=ncuc-discuss&T=0&O=D&X=1988C02DA913349905&Y=mueller%40syr.edu&P=8740
>>
>> Any position must use these discussions and drafts
>> as a starting point.
>>
>>
>> The Marrakech meeting discussed these positions
>> extensively. That was
>> in fact the largest real-time grouping of
>> constituency members in some
>> time. It is unacceptable to trash that work.
>>
>> Please do not submit this report to the Rapporteur
>> group, or to anyone
>> else, otherwise the constituency will have to
>> disavow it and that will
>> make us all look ridiculous, and undermine your
>> credibility in the
>> process. 
>>
>> I have only read the renewal part. Since that was
>> completely orthogonal
>> to what we have discussed and written so far, I fear
>> going any further.
>> As time permits, I'll read the rest of it but can't
>> say that I am
>> looking forward to it. 
>>
>> Really, Danny, show some respect for the fact that
>> this is a
>> CONSTITUENCY that needs to develop positions as a
>> group. 
>>
>>
>>>>> Danny Younger <dannyyounger at YAHOO.COM>
>> 10/17/2006 8:24 AM >>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> A formal NCUC Statement has been prepared covering
>> the
>> following topics:
>>
>> 1)  gTLD renewal policy
>> 2)  policy for gtld Consensus Policy limitations
>> 3)  gTLD price control policy
>> 4)  policy for ICANN fees pertaining to gTLDs
>> 5)  policy on the use of gTLD registry data 
>> 6)  gTLD development/infrastructure investment
>> policy
>>
>> This statement is attached as a twenty (20) page
>> Word
>> document.  The statement has already been forwarded
>> to
>> the NCUC Policy Committee for review and now awaits
>> your constituency member comments, suggested
>> modifications, and/or partial or complete revisions.
>>
>> Per the timetable established by Rapporteur Groups A
>> &
>> B, our final work-product must be submitted by 24
>> October in order to be included in the Final Report
>> submitted to the GNSO PDP Task Force on Contractual
>> Conditions for Existing Registries.
>>
>> As the views of our constituency will not
>> necessarily
>> coincide with those expressed by other
>> constituencies,
>> it is important that a cogent Minority Report makes
>> its way to the ICANN Board via the GNSO's Final
>> Report.
>>
>> Each paragraph has been numbered for ease of
>> discussion, and all member comments will be
>> referenced
>> in the final version of this document.
>>
>> I look forward to your assistance in properly
>> presenting the NCUC view on these matters.
>>
>> Thank you for your assistance,
>> Danny Younger
>> isoc-ny
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
>> protection around 
>> http://mail.yahoo.com 
>>
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> 

-- 

Carlos A. Afonso
diretor de planejamento
Rits - Rede de Informações para o Terceiro Setor
***************************************************************
Projeto Sacix - Apoio técnico a iniciativas de inclusão digital
com software livre, mantido pela Rits em colaboração com o
Coletivo Digital. Para mais informações:
www.sacix.org.br   www.rits.org.br   www.coletivodigital.org.br
***************************************************************


More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list