Whois task force. IPC want mpre reps.

[KathrynKL at AOL.COM]

Yes in theory, but in practice I have mixed feelings about this.  It is
already tough enough for us to field 3 people.  Do we have the resources to field 6
(and try to send them to the meeting, pay for participation in
teleconferences, etc)?

Sigh,
Kathy

<<perhaps not a bad idea, to have a deputy to share ideas with.

Adam



<http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg00280.html >

Dear Bruce -

The IP constituency is currently looking at appropriate ways to
contribute to the work of the 3 Whois task forces in an efficient
manner. In this context, it is our view that nominating only one
representative to each TF would result in excessive work-load for
each chosen person.

Therefore, I would like to invoke the last sentence in PDP sec. 5(1)
(i.e. "The Council may increase the number of Representatives per
constituency that may sit on a task force in its discretion in
circumstances that it deems necessary or appropriate.") and would be
very grateful if you could advise on how this provison could be
applied in the present case.

I hope this can be done as swiftly as possible without slowing the
process of convening the TFs. It is our conviction that it would be
both necessary and appropriate to allow for one or more alternates
per task force as the adequate way to proceed.

Kind regards -

Niklas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20031108/9e7e7b0f/attachment.html>