[ncdnhc-discuss] No proxy system for NCDNHC.

[Erick Iriarte Ahon]

Excuse..
I'm for the proxy too.

Erick


At 01:36 p.m. 24/10/2002 +0900, YJ Park wrote:
>For the Proxy: Harold Feld
>
>Against the Proxy:
>Milton Mueller, Dany Vandromme, Alejandro Pixanty, Ted Byfield.
>
>[Abstain?]Clarification requested: Norbert Klein.
>
>Therefore, proxy will be not adopted during NCDNHC meeting.
>Thank you,
>YJ
>
> > Since NCDNHC was recognized as a constituency by ICANN Board
> > in August 1999, NCDNHC has tried to build effective working relations
> > among members through email, teleconference and f2f meeting.
> >
> > After more than three years, it is high time for NCDNHC to introduce
> > another working mechanism in addition to the existing mechanisms
> > which has turned out to be effective system in other constituency
> > especially in ccTLD constituency and NC.
> >
> > "PROXY"
> >
> > A number of members expressed they could not come to Shanghai
> > meeting due to many reasons. However, if we introduce "PROXY",
> > those who cannot be in Shanghai in person can "indirectly" attend
> > NCDNHC meeting giving their "Proxy" to other members who are
> > planning to attend.
> >
> > If this is agreeable, I would like to propose NCDNHC in Shanghai
> > shall introduce "PROXY" to its members.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20021024/e4eddbf8/attachment-0001.html>