[ncdnhc-discuss] Draft Agenda for Shanghai NCDNHC Meeting

[Alejandro Pisanty - DGSCA y FQ, UNAM]

Hi!

brief comments:

1. the "proxy" system has not been clarified enough for the constituency.
It is very different in the case of the Names Council or any fixed-size
representative body, where on occasional absence a voter may delegate
his/her vote to another voter. Here in the NCC the only apparent result,
as Milton has explained, is an inflated but artificial appearance of more
people supporting views or resolutions than there actually would be. A
form of "stacking" which will add nothing positive.

2. re the internal, administrative issues. It is difficult to imagine that
this constituency will be able to take up its foreseeable role in the near
future without somehow solving these problems; so the fact that there have
not been enough members of the constituency to take up the
responsibilities which Dany has signalled may mean that they do not eget
discussed in Shanghai, but still they compromise the constituency's
viability. While it may happen that no AdCom/NC members attend the meeting
in Shanghai, the work is still there to be done online.

Yours,

Alejandro Pisanty

.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
Director General de Servicios de Computo Academico
UNAM, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
Tel. (+52-55) 5622-8541, 5622-8542 Fax 5622-8540
http://www.dgsca.unam.mx
*
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, www.isoc.org
 Participa en ICANN, www.icann.org
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .



On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, YJ Park wrote:

> Dany wrote;
>
> > I suggest to add points about:
> > + the administrative and financial management of the constituency
> > + the constituency planning for facing its debt to the NC
> > + the reporting of the NC rep to the constituency
>
> The first two issues are related with administration issues
> which nobody in the constituency cares and have responsibility for.
>
> Therefore, for the practical reason, they were deleted. Even if
> they are on the agenda, it is ambiguous at this current stage
> who can be the right people or person to make a report or to
> initiate the discussion.
>
> If you have any further idea on this, it would be great.
>
> Last suggested item can be added to the agnda under the condition
> that there will be at least one NC member in the meeting or written
> report by the current NC which needs confirmation from the NC
> members.
>
> Thank you,
> YJ
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>