[ncdnhc-discuss] Board retreats and fully transparent process for ICANN

[Dave Crocker]

At 11:13 PM 5/27/2002 -0400, Jonathan Weinberg wrote:
>On Mon, 27 May 2002, Dave Crocker wrote:
> > >  City halls, Shareholder meetings, the Federal Communications 
> Commission,
> >
> > and they are permitted closed meetings.
>
>         Like other U.S. federal multimember agencies, the U.S. Federal
>Communications Commission is forbidden closed meetings except in very
>limited circumstances

Isn't it nice the way constaintly shooting a shotgun will eventually hit 
something, no matter how bad one's aim?

And isn't nice how useful it is to carefully constrain an analysis, so that 
it abstracts out essential points?

ICANN is a subject to a combination of constraints.  When you folks start 
producing examples that are subject to the same PATTERN of constraints, 
there will be something to discuss.

Until then, this exercise is mostly a pretty feeble debating game by folks 
more interested in winning points than in pursuing a productive 
consideration of ICANN behavior.

d/

----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dave at tribalwise.com>
TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850