[ncdnhc-discuss] Note how the NC distracts people

[Jim Fleming]

Note how the NC distracts people to focus on the issue (distraction) they decide is important.

.ORG is not viewed as a "core task".

The NC does not note that the "restructuring" was done long ago and the NC has no impact.

Last year at this time, the ICANN staff was of course horse-trading .COM and the NC
and Board were not a factor. People were distracted to go fill out surveys and buy lottery tickets.

--
JF



Re: [council] Agenda Friday NC
To: Philip Sheppard <philip.sheppard at aim.be> 
Subject: Re: [council] Agenda Friday NC 
From: Chun Eung Hwi <ehchun at peacenet.or.kr> 
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 21:20:36 +0900 (KST) 
cc: council at dnso.org 
In-Reply-To: <00d101c1d17f$b922c540$6501a8c0 at aim.be> 
Sender: owner-council at dnso.org 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Philip,

O.K. I agree to focus on restructuring itself. 
I will propose this issue separately later through this list.


Regards,

Chun Eung Hwi
------------------------------------------------------------
Chun Eung Hwi
General Secretary, PeaceNet | phone:     (+82) 2- 2062-1302
Seoul Yangchun P.O.Box 81   |   pcs:     (+82) 019-259-2667 
Seoul, 158-600, Korea       | eMail:   ehchun at peacenet.or.kr   
------------------------------------------------------------


On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Philip Sheppard wrote:

> I note the request for adding new items (dot org, fees) to the agenda for
> Fridays's call (March 22). I would prefer to not do so. The fees question
> will be dealt with by the Budget Committee in the first instance. On dot org
> it would be better to dialogue by e-mail, make a case and propose an action.
> 
> Losing focus on our core task at out very first meeting is something we
> should avoid.
> 
> Philip
> NC Chair
>