[ncdnhc-discuss] Voter turnout in Michigan school board elections
Kent Crispin
kent at songbird.com
Fri Jun 7 22:29:21 CEST 2002
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 03:28:32PM -0400, James Love wrote:
> "In almost half of Michigan school districts fewer than 5% of eligible
> voters participated in the 2000 school board election"
>
> http://www.epc.msu.edu/publications/databrief/databrief5.pdf
>
> Voter turnout averaged 7.8% in school board elections in 2000. Turnout
> ranged from .3% to 60% of registered voters. In almost half of Michigan
> school districts fewer than 5% of eligible voters participated in the 2000
> school board election. Three-quarters of dis tricts had turnouts of 10% or
> less. Not all eligible citizens register to vote, so the percentage of
> eligible citizens voting in school board elections is even lower than the
> 7.8% turnout among registered voters.
Thanks -- this is a document I can cite later. At the very beginning it
says:
School board members are democratically accountable to the voters in
their communities. If citizens are unhappy with the performance of
their schools, they can elect a new board. Unfortunately, Michigan
has historically had very low voter turnouts for school board
elections. Low turnouts reduce the effectiveness of school board
elections as a mechanism for democratic accountability. When only a
few people vote, school board members are only held accountable by
those few rather than by the larger community. Low voter turnouts
also increase the likelihood that a small group with a special agenda
will be able to swing a school board election.
The last line bears repeating, since it is so germane to our situation.
It says:
"Low voter turnouts also increase the likelihood that a small group
with a special agenda will be able to swing a school board election."
--
Kent Crispin "Be good, and you will be
kent at songbird.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list